Save Our Children: Overcoming the Narrative That Gays and Lesbians Are Harmful to Children

By Niedwiecki, Anthony | Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, Fall 2013 | Go to article overview

Save Our Children: Overcoming the Narrative That Gays and Lesbians Are Harmful to Children


Niedwiecki, Anthony, Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy


The United States has seen a dramatic shift in support for marriage equality for same-sex couples over the past decade, culminating in a recent gay rights victory in the U.S. Supreme Court. (1) Also in the past year, several states have approved marriage rights for same-sex couples through the legislative or initiative process, reflecting the increasing cultural and political acceptance of marriage between same-sex partners. Polls support this cultural shift in the United States, with a 16% jump in approval for same-sex marriage since 2001 and a 24% jump since 1996. (2) This reflects a significant change in public opinion over a very short period of time and is in stark contrast to the large number of states that have passed and continue to enforce constitutional amendments banning marriage rights for same-sex couples. (3)

After the Hawaii Supreme Court held in 1993 that a ban on same-sex marriage was presumptively unconstitutional because it made an impermissible classification based on sex, (4) opponents of same-sex marriage successfully used the initiative process to pass several state constitutional amendments to prevent similar rulings by other state courts. (5) This backlash prompted many legal scholars to debate whether gay rights activists should have used the judicial system or the political process to gain marriage rights. (6) On one side, scholars argued that pushing social change through the court system does not produce tangible results (7) and may cause a backlash. (8) Others argued that using the court system to push for social change can serve to educate the public, (9) sway public opinion, (10) and foster the political process. (11) Some opponents of using the judicial system point to the continuing conflict associated with Roe v. Wade, (12) and others point to the political backlash that resulted from a few state court decisions holding that bans on same-sex marriage were unconstitutional. (13)

In one of the leading books on whether courts can influence social change, The Hollow Hope, Gerald Rosenberg analyzes the extent that courts have helped advance many political and social causes in the last several decades, focusing on civil rights, abortion and women's rights, the environment, and criminal law. (14) In his most recent edition, he details the fight for marriage equality for same-sex couples, discussing the backlash and the subsequent change in public opinion, but he asserts that the benefit of using the court system to advance civil rights is generally outweighed by the subsequent political cost. (15)

This discussion about the role that courts should play in advancing civil rights fails to address the difference in how voters and judges evaluate arguments. A communication theory by Professor Walter Fisher proves instructive in understanding this difference. Fisher's theory, called the "narrative paradigm," presumes that all humans are storytellers and communicate mostly through stories. (16) People evaluate the stories they hear based on their own experiences, views of morality, and values. (17) Fisher labels this evaluative process "narrative rationality." (18) Fie believes that only experts have the skills and abilities to use logic and reason, where most lay people make judgments based on culture, biography, and their life experiences. (19) Under Fisher's theory, voters are lay people who are more likely to evaluate political arguments using their own life experiences and views on morality, while judges are experts who are more likely to use reason and logic to evaluate legal arguments.

This difference between the rhetoric used in initiative campaigns and the rhetoric used in courts helps explain why gay rights activists have generally been much more successful at advancing marriage rights through the judicial system than through the political process. (20) When a few local governments were passing laws that protected gay people from discrimination, gay rights opponents learned very quickly that they could reverse or block those laws through the ballot initiative process. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Save Our Children: Overcoming the Narrative That Gays and Lesbians Are Harmful to Children
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.