Networked Apathy: Georgian Party Politics and the Role of Social Media

By Kakachia, Kornely; Pataraia, Tamara et al. | Demokratizatsiya, Spring 2014 | Go to article overview

Networked Apathy: Georgian Party Politics and the Role of Social Media


Kakachia, Kornely, Pataraia, Tamara, Cecire, Michael, Demokratizatsiya


Abstract: This article examines the way in which Georgia's political parties use social media. Overall, of available social media, politicians and parties prefer to use Facebook, but they do not take advantage of its various interactive features. Politicians point out that the internet audience in Georgia is not yet large enough for them to pay much attention to on-line campaigning. In fact, the main consequence of social media in Georgia seems to be improved communications between the political opposition and Western partners, who exert a powerful influence on Georgian politics.

**********

Digital and internet technologies are increasingly recognized as prominent tools for social and political mobilization. (1) The 2008 election victory of U.S. President Barack Obama appeared to signal a watershed moment as internet technologies--particularly social media--likely played a uniquely pivotal role in marshaling citizen support and financial contributions. (2) The so-called "Arab Spring," a wave of people-power revolutions that swept across the Middle East and North Africa in 2010-2011, is often credited as another case study for the potentially powerful role of social media in social and political organization. (3) This notion is echoed in recent literature showing the potentially significant role that internet technology played in the outcome of multiparty democratic elections in Australia. (4)

Studies of social media and political mobilization in post-communist Eurasia suggest that, in spite of levels of regional internet penetration at least generally comparable to those in the Middle East and North Africa, there is less evidence that internet technologies can currently play as significant a role as in the Middle East and North Africa or in liberal democratic societies. While the use of social media in the 2011 Russia protests highlights social media's ability to amplify discontent, the lack of apparent direct or indirect results undercuts hopes that the "Arab Spring" model of social media-based political mobilization is readily replicable. (5) In fact, internet technologies in some regimes appear to be increasingly as much a means of repression as liberation. "Networked authoritarianism," to borrow Rebecca MacKinnon's description of social media-based repression in China, (6) is observed as an aspect of regime control, for example, in post-communist Azerbaijan. (7)

However, party politics in Georgia offers an altogether different type of test case. While it is a post-communist state with a profoundly personalized political system, Georgia has also historically inhabited the "middle ground" of regime typologies. Though there are indications that Georgia may be moving again toward democratization, it has generally fit the "competitive authoritarian" hybrid model proposed by Stephen Levitsky and Lucan Way. (8) And while post-independence Georgian regimes have consistently exhibited authoritarian tendencies to varying degrees, the country has also featured a degree of political competitiveness and pluralism that has set it apart from "classical" authoritarian regimes. Accordingly, Georgia would seem to offer an interesting milieu for the employment of internet technologies and social media as tools for political mobilization.

This article considers the role of digital technology in Georgian party politics by examining social media activity related to the October 2012 Georgian parliamentary elections. The analysis focuses on the role of social media campaigns in the outcome of the election and how they contributed to the success of new actors emerging in the party system.

The methodology is primarily qualitative. We identified eleven prominent political parties in Georgia based on their political activities and successful electoral campaigns. We then analyzed and scored the parties' website and social media content for comparative purposes. Researchers examined information published on party websites regarding: ideology; internal management; strategies for recruiting new members; human resource management and career development policies; public relations strategies; capacity for political analysis; and the way in which political parties registered members, supporters, and their interaction with online users. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Networked Apathy: Georgian Party Politics and the Role of Social Media
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.