The Armenian Genocide and Foreign Policy

By Tusan, Michelle | Phi Kappa Phi Forum, Summer 2014 | Go to article overview

The Armenian Genocide and Foreign Policy


Tusan, Michelle, Phi Kappa Phi Forum


The notion of honor in foreign affairs runs deep in the American psyche, even if recent controversial tactics such as prisoner torture in Abu Ghraib and secret drone attacks in Pakistan contradict the ideal for some. This high-minded U.S. ambition derives from the country's Anglo-American heritage and the belief that with power comes responsibility. The principle, however, often fails in practice. Why? This article analyzes one reason: the very genesis of the lofty impulse.

British precursors

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

The beginning of U.S. military, political, and financial clout dated to the end of World War I, with the armistice in November 1918 and the Treaty of Versailles in June 1919. U.S. influence grew after it helped Allied forces, spearheaded by Britain, France and Russia, defeat Germany and Austria-Hungary, Turkey and Bulgaria. Fresh from victory, a growing economy, and a perception of its elevated rank in the postwar order, the U.S. lent money and offered advice to devastated countries across Europe. This abetment created an opportunity for America to challenge Britain as the new global hegemon.

But the U.S. did not completely throw off the British mantle. Instead, leaders including President Woodrow Wilson remained influenced by the aims that had guided Britain's internationalism during the height of its dominance in the 19th century. Part of that inheritance was the insistence that honor and responsibility inform geopolitics. In other words, WWI, which commenced 100 years ago this summer, became the initial test for America to act abroad on its values.

During the war, the killing of more than 1 million Armenian civilians by the Ottoman Empire outraged the West) Europe's Great Powers declared it a "crime against humanity." This first large-scale extermination of a people in the 20th century demanded a legal and humanitarian response.

Outrage over the Armenian Genocide of 1915 did not come out of nowhere. Antecedents traced to 19th-century Great Power politics, when Britain had asserted its prerogative as a defender of minority rights. (2) The outcry over the "Bulgarian Atrocities" of May 1876, when Ottoman soldiers killed thousands of civilians on the eve of the Russo-Turkish War, set the standard for Britain's burgeoning duty to protect persecuted minorities. (3) The 1878 Treaty of Berlin that ended the conflict made Britain the primary protector of Christian minorities in the predominantly Muslim Ottoman Empire. Nations such as Russia and France joining with Britain in the Concert of Europe understood that a social conscience was integral to transnational governance. (4)

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

For Britain this mandate loomed especially large. The slaughter of 200,000 Armenians in a series of massacres committed in the mid-1890s under the despotic rule of Ottoman Sultan Abdul Hamid II further crystalized the imperative of what the London Times called a "humanitarian crusade" on behalf of Armenians. (5) Former British Prime Minister W. E. Gladstone invoked the "language of humanity, justice and wisdom" (6) and used the Berlin treaty to galvanize public and private advocacy organizations on a quest for justice for minority Eastern Orthodox Christians living in the Ottoman Empire and belonging, many experts contended, to a religion that shared a common origin with the Church of England. (7) Religious and secular groups alike accepted the charge, raising money and conducting outreach.

Thus, the 1890s Armenian massacres further confirmed Britain's role as enforcer of humanitarian principles codified in international law in the late 1870s as well as in popular consciousness. (8) The campaign appealed to the compassionate disposition to stop "the hugest and foulest crimes that have ever stained the pages of human history" (9) This righteous indignation would resurface during the 1909 bloodshed at Adana, when an estimated 25,000 Armenian Christians perished at the hands of Ottoman Turks. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Armenian Genocide and Foreign Policy
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.