Is It Time to Let Go? as Climate Change Takes Hold, Attempts to Control Flooding on the Somerset Levels Will Become Increasingly Difficult, and Other, More Radical Approaches Will Be Needed

By Rowe, Mark | Geographical, May 2014 | Go to article overview

Is It Time to Let Go? as Climate Change Takes Hold, Attempts to Control Flooding on the Somerset Levels Will Become Increasingly Difficult, and Other, More Radical Approaches Will Be Needed


Rowe, Mark, Geographical


[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

At the height of this winter's floods, 65 square kilometres of land on the Somerset Levels were under water and 65 pumps were working 24 hours a day to drain 65 million cubic metres of floodwater off the land. In the wettest winter since 1766, the levels had been hit by a one-in-100-year flood for the second time in 14 months.

That much--and the devastation and misery endured by those on the receiving end everyone can agree on. When it comes to the causes--and how to deal with the floods of the future--however, the situation, like the water that overran the fields and villages, is somewhat murkier.

In the short term, the dredging of the bifurcation of the rivers Tone and Parrett, the two major rivers that feed the levels, has already begun. Dredging was at the centre of the fallout over the flooding: farmers, villagers and local and national politicians complained that insufficient dredging had caused the rivers to flood. As a government body, the Environment Agency will dutifully carry out the work.

Yet it's nigh on impossible to identify an expert--geographer, hydrologist, engineer who believes that dredging alone will make much difference. 'There has been an awful lot of garbage, if not untruths and lies, about dredging,' says David Demeritt, professor of geography at King's College London. 'Dredging gives you a bit of extra capacity in the drains, so a little bit more of the rainfall will drain away more rapidly. But it won't make any difference with the order of rain we're talking about. If you dredge, somewhere downstream the water just ends up in someone's kitchen more quickly.'

Instead, the consensus among flooding experts is that dredging and dyke building will make things worse, not better. To seek to tame the floods, they argue, is to miss the point in a climate-changed world of more extreme weather patterns and inexorable sea-level rise.

In a paper issued in February, the Met Office concluded that sea levels around the UK are likely to rise by 11-16 centimetres by 2030, relative to 1990. Daily heavy rain events are also likely to become more frequent--what in the 1960s might have been a one-in-125-day event is now more likely to be a one-in-85-day event.

Dutch experts, meanwhile, have identified one factor at play on the levels that until now has been all but overlooked--subsidence. This has plagued the Netherlands, where land, drained for four centuries, has subsided at a rate of one to two centimetres a year.

'Over the centuries, subsidence has caused some areas, including cities such as Gouda, to go from being at or above sea level to eight metres below sea level,' says Marcel Silvius of Wetlands International.

'When you drain peatland for agriculture, the land compacts,' he continues. Peat is about 90 per cent water, so it subsides under its own pressure. Then the oxygen in the soil starts the biological process of breaking down the organic matter in the peat. This converts the carbon into carbon dioxide, releasing this greenhouse gas into the atmosphere--and making the soil subside even further.'

A TIME FOR PRAGMATISM

So what does all of this mean for the levels? Silvius agrees that all farms and homes could be defended, but the cost would be unfeasibly high. Demeritt, too, believes that the scale of such an undertaking hasn't fully been taken on board. The government seems to be saying that it will protect everything, everywhere,' he says. 'Is that true? It's not right to say that it isn't possible--we can protect every bit of coastline if we want to, if money truly is no object. But in practice, that would mean that your riverside home will never flood only because it has a 15-metre dyke in front of it, so you can't even see the river.'

Defences could, in theory, involve a Thames Barrier-style construction on the levels, but the scale of such a project would, Demeritt argues, be out of all proportion to the benefits. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Is It Time to Let Go? as Climate Change Takes Hold, Attempts to Control Flooding on the Somerset Levels Will Become Increasingly Difficult, and Other, More Radical Approaches Will Be Needed
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.