Pesticide Risk to Farm Workers

By Wiles, Richard | The Nation, October 5, 1985 | Go to article overview

Pesticide Risk to Farm Workers


Wiles, Richard, The Nation


Pesticide Risk To Farm Workers

In August 1983, Zacarias Ruiz was spraying a weed-and-bug killer called Dinoseb on cotton in Texas. Like most "undocumented workers,' he wore no special clothing to shield him from the chemical which leaked profusely from his backpack sprayer. Later that day, he developed a high fever and was taken to the local hospital, where he was given aspirin. A few hours later he died, another victim of pesticide misuse and a regulatory system that fails to prevent it.

What exactly caused Ruiz's death? Clearly, the leaky sprayer should have been fixed before he put it on. And he should have been wearing protective clothing, required by law in California but not at the time in Texas or other states. But the whole tragic affair could have been avoided if the manufacturer, Platte Chemical, had stated clearly on the label that Dinoseb poisonings should not be treated with aspirin, which makes the chemical more potent. Although pesticide labels are supposed to bear such warnings, the Environmental Protection Agency hadn't got around to checking up on Dinoseb, or the dozens of other products that pose similar risks.

No one is quite sure how many people in the United States are poisoned by pesticides each year, since most field hands don't seek medical treatment unless they become incapacitated, or even how many are at risk of falling ill from pesticide exposure. According to a Federal task force, about half of the nation's 5 million agricultural laborers face the same danger Zacarias Ruiz did. Farm workers' organizations in various states paint a more disturbing picture: in some instances, fully two-thirds of the work force has been sprayed directly or covered with drifting insecticides, while an even greater number may be contaminated by "dislodgeable residues,' which shake loose from standing crops.

Strangely, the E.P.A. has interpreted the lack of information as an argument in favor of relaxed vigilance. Under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), adopted in 1947 and rewritten in 1972, the agency is charged with insuring that pesticides "will not generally cause unreasonable adverse effects on the environment,' including human beings. Agency scientists review toxicological data supplied by manufacturers and set a so-called tolerance level for residues in food. They also decide how each chemical should be applied: for example, an insecticide that is registered for use on potatoes at two pounds per acre may not legally be sprayed at other dosages or on other crops. Normally, the E.P.A. will not license a new pesticide (or will cancel an old one) if it causes cancer, birth defects or other serious disorders at a rate higher than one per million among the general population. But until recently, the agency had steadfastly refused to require tests by manufacturers that measure the unique exposure of farm workers or to impose restrictions aimed at reducing it. Instead, the agency pretends that everybody, even field hands who work in an atmosphere permeated with pesticide residues, absorbs no more than the minute quantities allowed in food.

Why the charade? Because FIFRA was a political compromise forged under intense pressure from both the farm lobby and the chemical industry. Unlike other labor laws, notably the Occupational Safety and Health Act and the Fair Labor Standards Act, FIFRA does not set strict standards for the workplace. It instructs the E.P.A. to balance pesticide regulations against the cost to growers or anyone else "throughout the agricultural economy.' Thus, agency officials are constantly required to judge whether the added expense of, say, including a warning against aspirin on a product label will be offset by the savings in human illness and suffering.

The results of such compromises are inevitable. Whereas the E.P.A. usually sticks to its one-per-million rule when the general public is at risk, with farm workers it is willing to take much greater chances: one in 100,000 or less. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Pesticide Risk to Farm Workers
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.