Lessons Lost in Sentencing: Welding Individualised Justice to Indigenous Justice

By Anthony, Thalia; Bartels, Lorana et al. | Melbourne University Law Review, August 2015 | Go to article overview

Lessons Lost in Sentencing: Welding Individualised Justice to Indigenous Justice


Anthony, Thalia, Bartels, Lorana, Hopkins, Anthony, Melbourne University Law Review


CONTENTS    I Introduction  II Sentencing Principles and the Relevance of Indigenous Background III One Step Forward: Accounting for Aboriginal Circumstances in     Canadian Sentencing  IV One Step Back: Accounting for Indigenous Circumstances in     Australian Sentencing   V Analysis of Bugmyin the Context of Individualised Justice       A Establishing the Link between Group and Individual Experience       B Considering Indigenous Status: Not Just a Principle of         Disadvantage  VI Conclusion 

I INTRODUCTION

The role of the criminal sentencing courts to account for the postcolonial experience of Indigenous peoples is of critical significance, not only for redressing the high incarceration rates of Indigenous people but also reflecting its incidence as a feature of Indigenous circumstance. In Australia, Indigenous offenders are heavily over-represented. (1) They account for 28 per cent of the prison population, (2) in spite of representing only 3 per cent of the general population. (3) The over-representation of Indigenous juveniles and Indigenous females is even more acute. Indigenous females account for over a third of the female prison population, (4) while Indigenous juveniles in Australia account for approximately 50 per cent of the youth detention population. (5) Over-incarceration is an aspect of systemic Indigenous disadvantage, which also includes economic deprivation, social marginalisation and poor health outcomes. (6) The decision to imprison contributes to Indigenous hardship through alienating individuals and fracturing community ties, (7) and increases the prospects of reoffending. (8) The effect is that large sections of the Indigenous population have ongoing contact with the prison system. (9) Sentencing in this context is not only a technical process of applying relevant factors to the offender and the offence but also a social responsibility.

In this article, we argue that sentencing courts can account for Indigenous systemic disadvantage while also promoting individualised justice--approaches that the High Court of Australia has regarded as antithetical. Indeed, recognition of systemic disadvantage provides for a fuller picture of the individual's circumstances. This has been accepted by the Supreme Court of Canada in sentencing Aboriginal offenders in R v Ipeelee ('Ipeelee'). (10) The extent of Aboriginal dispossession, disadvantage and over-incarceration is similar in Canada. For example, in Canada approximately 23 per cent of the prison population is Aboriginal, despite Aboriginal Canadians constituting approximately 4 per cent of the general population. (11) The Supreme Court has noted that for sentences to be condign to the individual there must be recognition of Aboriginal offenders' specific background as well as the broader circumstances of their communities. (12)

The High Court of Australia held in Bugmy v The Queen ('Bugmy) that it is not for sentencing courts to account for the broader experiences of Indigenous Australians as a feature of their common history and systemic inequality, or to promote non-custodial and rehabilitative sentencing options in recognition of these facts or the ensuing strengths inherent in Indigenous group membership and survival. (13) The Court rejected submissions that the Canadian approach to sentencing Aboriginal offenders should be adopted in Australia. (14) We argue that this represents a missed opportunity by the High Court to grapple with the complex interrelationship between individualised justice and Indigenous circumstances in the sentencing of Indigenous offenders.

II SENTENCING PRINCIPLES AND THE RELEVANCE OF INDIGENOUS BACKGROUND

Sentencing is a complex task. Sentencing judges and magistrates must take into account all of the circumstances of the offence and of the offender and structure a sentence that achieves a balance of competing purposes (discussed below). The High Court of Australia describes the purposes of sentencing and their application in the following way:

    protection of society, deterrence of the offender and of others who    might be tempted to offend, retribution and reform. … 

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Lessons Lost in Sentencing: Welding Individualised Justice to Indigenous Justice
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.