Opposing the Opposition? Binarity and Complexity in Political Resistance

By de Vries, Leonie Ansems; Rosenow, Doerthe | Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, December 2015 | Go to article overview

Opposing the Opposition? Binarity and Complexity in Political Resistance


de Vries, Leonie Ansems, Rosenow, Doerthe, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space


Abstract

This article explores dimensions of political action that transgress the limitations of traditionally modern, opposition-focused conceptualisations. While there has been a turn to new nonoppositional ontologies in the last decades, there has been less exploration of what this could mean concretely for a political activism that aims to go beyond mere 'micropolitical' transformation. To address this lack, this article examines the tensions between binarity and complexity through an engagement with political resistance against genetically modified organisms. This brings to light that the ontology of complexity pursued by some anti-genetically modified organism activists is ultimately grounded in a binarisation of both politics (one is either 'for' or 'against' genetically modified organisms) and life (which is either 'natural' or 'unnatural'). Whilst problematic, this binarisation also informs the success of anti-genetically modified organism activism. An engagement with the philosophy of Deleuze and Guattari, especially through the notion of the 'encounter', brings out this paradox and serves to radicalise the ontology of complexity argued for by anti-genetically modified organism activists in order to open up different avenues for thinking about and 'doing' political resistance.

Keywords Resistance, genetically modified organisms, Deleuze, complexity, encounter, politics

Introduction

This article explores the question of how to pursue and encourage political contestation from a position that acknowledges the significance of binary conceptualisations, but that is at the same time uncomfortable with a mode of politics that is exclusively geared towards them. While binary understandings might be indispensable for the success of political action, it is important to understand what ways of thinking and acting they render invisible; what they (necessarily) exclude. As Brian Massumi (Massumi and Zournazi, 2003: 220) points out, if you want 'to critique something in any kind of definitive way', you need to 'pin it down'. You need to separate it out, 'attribute^..] set characteristics to it' in order to enable 'final judgment'. What is lost are 'other more moving dimensions of experience'.

As we will maintain, acknowledging these other, non-binary dimensions of political action requires a different ontology of life; one that moves beyond traditionally modern understandings that prioritise bounded entities and their clear-cut binary identities. We aim to draw out such a different ontology by exploring a particular example of political activism: the anti-genetically modified organisms (GMO) movement. As the next two sections will show, at least in its earliest manifestation, in parts of the movement the opposition to GMOs was grounded in a different ontology derived from complexity science, according to which all life develops in complex, non-binary and unpredictable ways. However, as we will demonstrate (particularly in 'The potential and limits of complexity science' section), this (scientific) understanding of complexity is limited insofar as only a certain direction of evolving life is acknowledged and tolerated, thereby generating new sets of binaries, such as the 'natural' versus the 'unnatural' or the 'harmonious' versus the 'disturbing'. In addition, '"Natural" democracy and "Authentic" identity? The dangers of binary politics' section of the article examines the dangerous implications this has for the--once again binary--organisation of political resistance, whilst acknowledging that the binaries that have emerged also ground the political force, and ultimately the success, of anti-GMO activism.

We engage the philosophy of Gilles Deleuze (and Felix Guattari) to make sense of this paradox, as well as to radicalise the different ontology of life emphasised by anti-GMO activists, and to thereby open up new avenues for thinking about and 'doing' political resistance more generally. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Opposing the Opposition? Binarity and Complexity in Political Resistance
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.