Earning Civil Rights: Why the Constitutional Right of Appointed Counsel Should Be Extended to Immigration Proceedings

By Cisneros, Lawrence | Harvard Journal of Hispanic Policy, Annual 2016 | Go to article overview

Earning Civil Rights: Why the Constitutional Right of Appointed Counsel Should Be Extended to Immigration Proceedings


Cisneros, Lawrence, Harvard Journal of Hispanic Policy


Introduction

The United States has the highest incarceration rate of any nation in the world. (1) A significant contribution to this mass incarceration is the detention and removal of hundreds of thousands of the undocumented (2) through a "civil" (non-criminal) process for immigration offenses. (3) Currently, in criminal (non-civil) proceedings, all individuals, undocumented or not, are appointed an attorney at no charge to address an unequal power dynamic in which a government lawyer has superior legal knowledge and skill, compared to a self-representing litigant who may not have formal education or legal training, or may be indigent. (4) This is not the case for civil proceedings. Undocumented persons facing removal proceedings are not legally entitled to an attorney (5) and are often processed without legal representation. (6) This is despite the similarities to criminal proceedings where the person facing removal is detained in jail-like conditions (7) for substantial periods of time while they await their hearing. (8)

This essay aims to comment on emerging initiatives to challenge this un-civil practice. This essay (1) compares the treatment and processing of undocumented persons in immigration hearings to those facing proceedings within the US criminal justice system, (2) provides a brief historical review that describes the legal underpinning of one's right to counsel, (3) analyzes the current state of the law and scholarship to illustrate efforts to provide such representation in immigration proceedings, and (4) puts forth a new "earned rights" doctrine, granting Constitutional protections and fundamental civil rights to these undocumented non-citizens living in our society, despite conventional legal reasoning and public opinion holding that undocumented persons should not receive such rights because they entered the country without proper documentation.

Section I: Detention as Punishment

In academic or political forums, relatively little attention has been focused on the fact that, as a consequence of mass incarceration and immigration legislation, Latinos now constitute the most-represented ethnic group in federal courts, primarily as a result of immigration crimes. (9) Total annual expenditures for US law enforcement mechanisms are approximately $212 billion. (10) As many wrestle with the tremendous unequal impact of mass incarceration to African American populations, (11) they also need to consider an interwoven connection to immigration. (12) Today, more than 400,000 immigrants are detained annually. (13) This is the largest number of non-citizens detained in the world. (14) Indeed, immigration detainees represent the fastest-growing segment of the jail population in the United States, driven in large part by illegal reentry, a federal crime that now constitutes one-fourth of the federal docket. (15)

In recent decades the civil immigration system has decidedly shifted to be more punitive. (16) Such a conflation between immigration and criminal law has developed a relatively new area of legal scholarship described as "Crimmigration." (17) The Supreme Court has recognized and reaffirmed repeatedly that for "noncitizens facing expulsion, deportation is often a far more severe consequence than a criminal sentence." (18) The court has not, however, extended criminal procedure safeguards to expulsion and deportation. (19)

This did not happen overnight or by accident. Legislators contributed to shifting attitudes of the "immigration problem" by reinforcing a coordinated regulatory environment. (20) Not only have crimes subject to deportation increased, but recent legislation has mandated detention of criminal immigrants, limited grounds for relief, limited federal judicial review, and applied changes of law retroactively to crimes that were not crimes previously. (21) Until the 1980s, deportations were limited to a number of crimes, detention of undocumented individuals was less common, and criminal sanctions for immigration offenses were rare. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Earning Civil Rights: Why the Constitutional Right of Appointed Counsel Should Be Extended to Immigration Proceedings
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.