Knowledge Management (KM) and the Epistemic Tradition

By Pemberton, J. Michael | Records Management Quarterly, July 1998 | Go to article overview

Knowledge Management (KM) and the Epistemic Tradition


Pemberton, J. Michael, Records Management Quarterly


All men by nature desire knowledge.

Aristotle (384-322 B.C.E)

There is little doubt that a phenomenon called "Knowledge Management" (KM) is fast becoming the "hottest thing" in the information sector since the computer. Books and articles(1) on KM are beginning to flow from many quarters. Computer-based list-servs,(2) World Wide Web sites,(3) and conferences on KM(4) are beginning to spring up, too, at an amazing pace. As with anything new and sensational that affects our field, reading and hearing what people have to say about KM are stimulating. Thinking about how we might play a role in knowledge development in our own organizations is fascinating, too.

Getting simple answers to complex questions, however, is never easy. Not only are there no cookbook approaches to "doing" KM, there is little agreement on what KM is. And some doubt exists that what we are seeing and trying to understand is really new. How can KM be "the latest thing" when Aristotle and his predecessors spent so much time thinking and teaching about knowledge some two thousand years ago? Part of the reason that there is so much commotion about "knowledge" today is that as yet we lack the tools to build a satisfying understanding of this abstract concept beyond the buzz-word level.

Some of the challenges to our understanding KM are worth noting. It is clear, for example, that not everyone means the same thing by identical terms; there is no standardized vocabulary. We find ourselves surrounded by ambiguous terms and key concepts such as "knowledge" vs "information," "data," "information ecology," "passive knowledge," "active knowledge," "explicit knowledge," "implicit knowledge," and many others. The continuing debate on terminology, among many voices, may be heard at:km@MCCMEDIA.COM.

DEFINING "KNOWLEDGE"

Much like a butterfly collector, I've been amassing definitions of "knowledge" and "knowledge" as compared to "information." Here is a very small, but bewildering, sample:

[Information is] knowledge communicated concerning some particular fact, subject, or event; that of which one is apprised or told ... (Oxford English Dictionary)

Knowledge is content, and information is process (Fritz Machlup, Knowledge: Its Creation, Distribution, and Economic Significance. Vol. I, Knowledge and Knowledge Production [Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1980])

An information retrieval system does not retrieve information. Indeed, information is something quite intangible; it is not possible to see, hear, or feel it. We are 'informed' on a subject if our state of knowledge on is somehow changed. Giving a requester a document on lasers or a reference to such a document does not inform him on the subject of lasers. Information transfer can only take place if the user reads the document and understands it. Information, then, is something that changes a person's state of knowledge on a subject ... (F. Wilfred Lancaster, Information Retrieval Systems: Characteristics, Testing and Evaluation [New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1979])

Knowledge is the intellectual manipulation of carefully verified observations. (Sigmund Freud)

... what can be recorded is not knowledge, but only a representation of knowledge. ... Where there is knowledge, there must be a knower; pieces of paper know nothing. ... In telling what knows, information and knowledge are logically distinct; but if we learn by observing rather than reading and listening there is no message and so no information (the semantic content of a message); we acquire information..., but this is not the same as acquiring knowledge. (Patrick Wilson, Public Knowledge and Private Ignorance [Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1977]) knowledge is pleasure which carries with it no reproach. Sydney Smith)

Knowledge itself does not give special power; only exclusive knowledge gives power to its possessors. (Eliot Friedson, ed. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Knowledge Management (KM) and the Epistemic Tradition
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.