Analyzing Newspaper Costs in Predation Lawsuits

By McLeod, Phillip W.; Maher, Michael W. | Newspaper Research Journal, Fall 1998 | Go to article overview

Analyzing Newspaper Costs in Predation Lawsuits


McLeod, Phillip W., Maher, Michael W., Newspaper Research Journal


With increasing competition from other information media, to maintain market share newspapers are under constant pressures to reduce prices for advertising, which managers often discount for targeted customer groups. However, in doing so newspapers run the risk of being charged with predatory pricing by a competitor or a government anti-trust enforcement agency.

Predatory pricing involves selling a product below cost with the intent of monopolizing a market by under-pricing competitors. It is unlawful under the Sherman Act and under the unfair pricing acts of many states. To minimize their risk of being dragged into expensive litigation, newspaper managers should be aware of the price (or cost) test used by courts in predation cases. They should also know how to accurately analyze their product costs to discount fairly. Current available literature reflects a lot of confusion about how to fairly analyze product costs under the unique circumstances of the newspaper business.

It is widely recognized in the industry that there are two products associated with a newspaper, a circulation product (copies of the newspaper) and an advertising product (really a service of providing access to readers). The standard industry approach to costing these products is to equate the circulation product to the editorial content of the newspaper and the advertising product to the paper's advertising content. However, this approach does not differentiate one component of the products from the total product sold and so results in an incorrect cost allocation.

This issue of how to define the newspaper products was critical in a California lawsuit filed by a thrice-weekly free paper against a large paid daily paper.(1) To attract some classified ads from the smaller paper, the large daily reduced its price by approximately 40 percent. The daily paper justified this reduction by claiming that the cost of its advertising product is limited to the cost of producing its advertising space. However, the paper's senior managers testified that advertisers buy their service based on the editorial content's ability to attract readers. The Court ruled that the daily paper's cost analysis was inadmissible because none of the cost of the editorial content was allocated to advertisers.

Current test for predatory pricing

In general, charges of predatory pricing are based on Section 2 of the Sherman Act or individual state codes that prohibit a company from selling a product below cost with the intent to injure competitors.(2) Because the law refers to selling below "cost," it is usually up to the courts to decide how to determine this cost.

Many courts have relied on an average variable cost calculation to determine predatory pricing. In a 1987 Yale Law Review(3) article, economists Phillip Areeda and Donald Turner argued that in competitive markets, price usually equals the short run marginal cost (SRMC) or the cost a firm incurs for producing each additional unit in the short term. Since it is difficult if not impossible to determine a firm's short run marginal cost, Areeda and Turner recommended using average variable cost of producing units instead(4)

Other prominent economists have argued that the correct test of predatory pricing is whether goods are sold below long-run marginal cost with the intent to exclude an equally or more efficient competitor.(5) Since there are also problems in calculating a firm's long-run marginal cost, Richard Posner and other economists recommend using average total cost as a proxy. Because pricing below average total cost could represent a rational decision for a firm that is disinvesting or exiting the market, Posner argues that any definition of predatory pricing should combine a price test based on average total cost with other factors such as predatory intent.(6) Some courts, most prominently California, have adopted the Posner approach to analyzing predatory pricing. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Analyzing Newspaper Costs in Predation Lawsuits
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.