Beliefs about the Nature of Sex/gender and Ethnic Inequality

By Eisinga, Rob; Elzen, Agens Van Den et al. | International Journal of Comparative Sociology, May 1999 | Go to article overview

Beliefs about the Nature of Sex/gender and Ethnic Inequality


Eisinga, Rob, Elzen, Agens Van Den, Verloo, Mieke, International Journal of Comparative Sociology


Introduction

One of the most passionate debates in feminist literature concerns the subject of difference: are there sex/gender differences, where do they come from, and can and should they be changed? On a very basic level, feminist theorists may be divided into those who deny and those who affirm the notion that women are different from men in ways that are socially meaningful. According to the "minimizers", as McFadden (1984) has labeled them, the social mode of being men and women is in no way linked with their nature as males and females. It is essentially a product of social mediations, ones which act to transform biological males and females into sociological men and women and thereby to consign women to an inferior position with respect to men (De Beauvoir, 1961; Chodorow, 1980; Collective, 1980). The way in which these social mediations, especially patriarchal ideology, are used to oppress women is that women are asserted to be different from men by nature. In the minimizers' opinion this assertion is extremely objectionable: males and females are both identically human beings and the only reason that their anatomical differences, for example, are stressed is that it helps to rationalize the elaboration of more important differences. According to the "maximizers" (McFadden, 1984), on the other hand, the differences between men and women are both radical and ineradicable. In their view women are essentially different from men with respect to, for example, the unconscious, libido and anatomy, and these differences require accentuation and celebration (Cixous, 1980; Feral, 1980; Irigaray, 1980). Moreover, the subordination of women to men cannot be a function of the ascription of difference. Instead, it can only be a result of the denial of authentic and absolute diffences. The source of this denial is not to be found in any particular ideology but in male values and identity inscribed in thought and language.

While these academic views - important Dutch contributions include Aerts (1991), Costera Meijer (1991), and Komter (1991) - have received considerable attention in women's studies and feminist theory in the past decades, it is astonishing and rather disappointing to find that public beliefs about the nature of men-women differences have been subject to surprisingly little study. There are, however, important reasons for interest in lay explanations of sex/gender differences. Not only do they provide a contribution to understanding the origins of sex discrimination, popular views on equal or unequal opportunity, for example, also shape perceptions of the legitimacy of public policy, such as affirmative action programs and may thereby either facilitate or hinder their implementation.

Furthermore, as it is well understood, the device of ascribing difference to a social group and then using that difference as a pretext for the subordination of that group, has not only been employed against women but also, among others, against blacks. Surprisingly, however, there have been only a few empirical studies that relate sexism to racism in one way or another (Bowker, 1981; Smith and Kluegel, 1984). Hence our knowledge of how or, for that matter, whether public beliefs about sex/gender differences are related to beliefs about racial and ethnic differences is not very great.

This study offers some steps toward filling this gap. It endeavors, first, to advance our understanding of the variety and extent of public beliefs about the causes of sex/gender inequality. The description presented below will focus on the content of the explanations, their theoretical structure in particular. Second, we will empirically examine these beliefs using data from a Dutch survey and explore what beliefs about men-women inequality seem to imply for beliefs about the causes of the native-migrant socio-economic gap, i.e., ethnic inequality in Holland. Finally, we will analyze structural and attitudinal characteristics of those who support particular rationalizations. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Beliefs about the Nature of Sex/gender and Ethnic Inequality
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.