Porcine Brothers Empty the Trough

By Dettmer, Jamie | Insight on the News, November 16, 1998 | Go to article overview

Porcine Brothers Empty the Trough


Dettmer, Jamie, Insight on the News


Democratic and Republican leaders are breathing mere easily after passing a heavily debated $520 billion spending bill. There were concessions on both sides.

Glorious it wasn't, but then rear-guard actions seldom are. They tend to be scrappy and confused engagements that buy time for maneuvers elsewhere. A good commander will talk them up, though -- good for morale, you know -- but all too often he'll make inflated claims. If the commander had exercised more foresight the defensive ploy might never have been needed in the first place. And that's what Democratic and Republican leaders were about in the wake of passing a $520 billion catchall spending bill. Neither side got what it wanted, but they all secured enough bits and pieces to claim victories of sorts. Hey, fella, it ain't a perfect world.

Both sides entered the spending clash with one thought in mind: to avoid a fight they couldn't win and to give a bit here to gain something there. President Clinton got his $18 billion for the International Monetary Fund, or IMF, but had to concede a package of reforms for the agency, including market-based interest rates for IMF loans, more transparency in the body's decision-making process and speedier repayments. He got his claim to 100,000 extra teachers, but failed to win a hefty down payment on a massive new school-construction program, so there may be nowhere to put them. The GOP got nearly $7 billion in extra funding for the Pentagon, the first serious increase in military spending since the 1980s. And overall, Republicans managed to keep discretionary spending -- it represents about one-third of the entire federal budget -- at the same level as last year.

Call it a draw, then, allowing each side to sustain a minimum amount of political damage; boast a little; and fight another day for tax cuts (if you're a Republican) and healthcare reform (if you're a Democrat). That is a point emphasized to angry conservatives in the Republican caucus by their own former bomb-thrower-in-chief, House Speaker Newt Gingrich. "If you can't work together, if you can't get 218 votes here, if you can't close down a filibuster in the Senate, if you can't get the president's signature, then what are you going to do?" he taunted his ideologues.

But there were losers in the spending bill: the noncombatants, i.e., taxpayers, who yet again were the victims of a business-as-usual mentality on Capitol Hill that saw billions of dollars earmarked in special-interest handouts, corporate and academic giveaways and federal boondoggles. Even the political pork king himself, Democratic Sen. Robert Byrd of West Virginia, the lawmaker who once said he wanted to be West Virginia's billion-dollar industry, was startled by the free-for-all. Maybe he wasn't an early-enough worm this time.

For all the highfalutin talk of strategy and tactics, of filibusters and threatened government shutdowns, there was a feeding frenzy in Washington -- and this time it wasn't the media who were chomping. Never before have so many snouts managed with such alacrity to feed from the same trough. "Where I come from we call this a `pig picking' -- 40 pounds of pork and everybody trying to pull off a piece.... In this town, somebody finds 50 cents laying on the floor and they run out and spend $2," says conservative Republican Rep. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina. Pork always has been a bipartisan issue -- Republicans want it and so do Democrats, and they proved it again. As George Wallace contended 30 years ago, there's not a dime's worth of difference between the parties when the whiff of a pig roast is wafting down congressional corridors.

The think tanks around town still are trying to identify all the slices of fatback, head cheese and pig ears larded into the omnibus bill -- all 40 pounds and nearly 4,000 pages of it. According to Thomas Schatz, president of the taxpayer watchdog Citizens Against Government Waste, the omnibus spending bill is a "national disgrace" because it is "full of special-interest projects that will cost taxpayers billions. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Porcine Brothers Empty the Trough
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.