Can the Results of Pollsters Be Trusted? Knowing Which Ones to Rely on Is Vital

By Gribbin, August | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), October 19, 1998 | Go to article overview

Can the Results of Pollsters Be Trusted? Knowing Which Ones to Rely on Is Vital


Gribbin, August, The Washington Times (Washington, DC)


Never before have public opinion polls and pollsters garnered so much attention - or been so influential.

Poll results have kept President Clinton's foundering presidency afloat. In coming weeks, they are expected either to buoy or help scuttle his scandal-scarred reign.

It's certain that polls will dictate candidates' strategies in the midterm congressional races and the 2000 presidential campaign. In fact, polls and pollsters have become indispensable to office seekers, to major news organizations, and - as many scholars and most pollsters see it - to the very functioning of democracy.

Yet polls differ widely. Some can be misleading. Results often conflict. Clearly, some are useless and some pollsters simply shills.

So which can be trusted? And who are these people who question a mere 800 or 1,000 of the country's 270,258,000 residents and purport to reveal the entire nation's opinion?

A new study by The Washington Times concludes that a relatively small number of public opinion and political polls are done well and are truly trustworthy. Scientific sampling had no part in producing the names of the most eminent, influential pollsters operating today. They were journalistically teased from numerous interviews with academics, politicians, pollsters and other insiders - in other words, from people in the know.

The names emerged from talks with that special group of researchers who serve politicians, or conduct policy-issue polls, or both. Among the immense, unknown number of survey researchers in universities and the business community, such practitioners are relatively few. The annual directory of political consultants published in Campaigns & Elections, a trade magazine, lists just 221 "survey research and analysis" firms serving "the campaign industry."

In the past, many of those pollsters came from academia and held advanced degrees in political science, history or statistics. More recently, less-tutored practitioners have been coming from the back rooms of various campaign headquarters. Knowing comparatively little about statistics or survey strategies, they cobble together teams of subcontractors to do interviewing, tabulating and the myriad chores that demand technical knowledge and experience.

They can do that because, as veteran political pollster Bruce Blakeman of Wirthlin Worldwide reports, "There are no standards. Anybody can become a pollster just by hanging out a shingle."

A pioneer some 70 years ago in political and public opinion polling was a former journalist, George "Ted" Gallup. He polled for a newspaper consortium and, in 1936, became one of three pollsters who introduced what then passed for "scientific" assessment of the voters' minds. (The others were Elmo Roper and Archibald Crossley, who became well-known for a time and are famous in polling history.)

After 1936, the late Mr. Gallup and his polls earned widespread respect. The Gallup Organization, now run by George Gallup Jr., is regarded by professionals as the nation's premier public-opinion research firm.

The Princeton, N.J.-based researcher produces the independent Gallup Poll on a huge range of topics, including public affairs. It tops nearly every expert's list of pollsters most highly respected for trustworthiness.

The runners-up are:

* Louis Harris & Associates Inc., New York

* The Pew Research Center for People and the Press, Washington

* Princeton Survey Research Associates, Princeton, N.J.

* Yankelovich Partners, Norwalk, Conn.

* Zogby International, Utica, N.Y.

Zogby International's founder, John Zogby, broke into polling in 1989 and currently runs the hottest firm producing election and public-affairs surveys. He won recognition when he became the only pollster to correctly call New York's gubernatorial race in 1994 and, among other coups, predicted the 1996 presidential race to the exact percentage point. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Can the Results of Pollsters Be Trusted? Knowing Which Ones to Rely on Is Vital
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.