Romancing Chemical Warfare

By Grenier, Richard | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), April 15, 1997 | Go to article overview

Romancing Chemical Warfare


Grenier, Richard, The Washington Times (Washington, DC)


Ah, the romance of history. The First World War, for example, the war to end all wars. Wasn't that romantic, leading as it did to the Treaty of Versailles, the treaty to end all treaties? And the Kellogg-Briand Pact, which unequivocally condemned "recourse to war for the solution of international controversies?" All of 62 nations ratified this romantic document, which proclaimed that the settlement of all conflicts, no matter of what origin or nature, should be sought by only peaceful means.

Germany joyously signed the Pact in 1928, and eight years later Hitler's troops joyously crossed the Rhine, which perhaps led a distinguished American historian to call Hitler an "authoritarian romantic." Which certainly gives us a new view of romanticism. The New York Times, furthermore, a romantic journal if ever there was one, promised that after crossing the Rhine Hitler would be restrained from further aggressive action by "world opinion." Which might lead you to think world opinion doesn't amount to much.

But we're now engaged in another vast, romantic endeavor, the banishment forever of chemical weapons from the face of the earth. The Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), which a lot of nice countries have already signed and on which Congressional hearings were conducted only last week, has come to the fore in removing this curse. Of course we already have the Geneva Convention of 1925 banning chemical warfare - as well as the Kellogg-Briand Pact, which bans war itself. So with chemical warfare and war itself already banned, one might wonder just how far this new ban gets us.

All of these pacts and conventions are unenforceable, needless to say, and the new CWC banning manufacture of chemical weapons, however improved, is still unverifiable. Since you can make chemical weapons in a space the size of your garage you can't even tell if countries are complying or not. And one wonders, while great nations are romantically dreaming about reducing the horrors of war, why they don't go after biological warfare, which is far more lethal than chemical. A crop duster flying over the Capitol Mall in Washington daintily spaying it with anthrax would kill a million people. If you're going to dream romantic dreams, why not make them really big?

So how about a Biological Warfare Convention, which whenever it suits them would be ignored at will by Iraq, Libya, and North Korea -none of which will sign - just as Iraq already blatantly ignored the Geneva Convention prohibiting the use of poison gas. Does anyone think that Iran, which believe it or not has actually signed the CWC ban, would actually be restrained by a sense of decency from breaking its word? What happened to Iraq as punishment for using chemical weapons against the rebellious Kurds? That's right. Nothing.

Of course a number of high-minded gentlemen who've concerned themselves with arms control feel that it's better to set a norm on chemical weapons and have it broken than not to have a norm at all. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Romancing Chemical Warfare
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.