Appeals Court Sets New Rules for Judges on `Jury Nullification': `Juror's Purposeful Unwillingness to Apply the Law' Is Deemed Grounds for Removal

By Murray, Frank J. | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), May 26, 1997 | Go to article overview

Appeals Court Sets New Rules for Judges on `Jury Nullification': `Juror's Purposeful Unwillingness to Apply the Law' Is Deemed Grounds for Removal


Murray, Frank J., The Washington Times (Washington, DC)


A federal appeals court has laid down the law on when judges may stop "jury nullification," dictating rules to govern the centuries-old practice in which jurors free the guilty they think are persecuted.

While lawyers find the new standard set forth last week to be tough - perhaps unattainable - both sides in the New York case consider it extraordinary even to try policing jurors' thoughts.

An opinion by Judge Jose A. Cabranes - listed as a possible candidate for a Supreme Court vacancy by President Clinton - said judges may expel a juror if they document his intent to ignore the law.

"We hold that a juror's purposeful unwillingness to apply the law - including stated intentions to [in effect] nullify on the basis of racial, cultural or political affinities with the defendants - is a proper basis for removal of a juror" until a verdict is announced, the court said in its 3-0 ruling.

It did not say how that can be done without violating jury secrecy, short of a confession.

Courts have long acknowledged, sometimes in despair, that nullification was a jury's prerogative, but, except in two states including Maryland, courts refuse to let judges instruct on that option.

Lawyers often argue it, saying only juries can police the police as Johnnie Cochran did in the O.J. Simpson case and defense lawyer L. John Van Norden did in the crack cocaine trafficking case that this ruling decided.

"It's recognized by justices like Oliver Wendell Holmes that juries have the right to nullify the law. It's not so much it's a right; it's a reality," Mr. Van Norden said.

In a peculiar twist, two newspapers, the New York Law Journal and the New York Times, were aided in quickly obtaining and understanding the import of Tuesday's decision by unusual phone discussions with Judge Cabranes, The Washington Times learned.

Both newspapers called prosecutors about the ruling before it was released and before lawyers in the case knew it was decided.

"Both of them had it before I even knew it was issued. They got the opinion instantly. The New York Law Journal got it before I did," said U.S. Attorney Thomas J. Maroney, who was unable to explain how that occurred.

The history of "jury nullification" is a long one. Early cases sheltered runaway slaves and contributed to religious and press freedom, but closing arguments at the O.J. Simpson trial turned on a race-tinged tactic Harvard Law School professor Randall Kennedy calls the "sabotage of justice."

Currently, "nullification" appears to the province largely of juries sympathetic to black defendants, but is actually more common, according to a government lawyer, from juries vindicating police officers and prison guards accused of mistreating criminals.

Under the ruling a juror clearly could be dismissed if he admitted his intentions. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Appeals Court Sets New Rules for Judges on `Jury Nullification': `Juror's Purposeful Unwillingness to Apply the Law' Is Deemed Grounds for Removal
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.