`Courts of Common Law' Punish with Phony Paper: `Patriot' Movement Has Fooled Many

By Richardson, Valerie | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), August 12, 1996 | Go to article overview

`Courts of Common Law' Punish with Phony Paper: `Patriot' Movement Has Fooled Many


Richardson, Valerie, The Washington Times (Washington, DC)


DENVER - At first glance it looked like just another legal document, no different from the hundreds that wind up on Colorado Attorney General Gale Norton's desk every day.

But something was clearly amiss. The document came from a panel dubiously titled the "One Supreme Court of North Carolina." And even by today's standards of judicial activism, the ruling was mind-boggling. It declared all Colorado laws and law enforcement agencies illegal and invalid.

What's more, a slew of state officials, including Mrs. Norton, were found guilty of enforcing the "illegal" laws and assessed punitive damages to the tune of $3.7 billion - each.

"That's a lot more zeroes than on any check I've ever written," she said with a laugh. Still, she takes such filings seriously. "These documents are clearly false, and it's a question of fraud."

Like thousands of other public officials, Mrs. Norton had inadvertently run afoul of a bogus but burgeoning underground legal system known as the "courts of common law." Known as the judicial wing of the "patriot" movement, such people's courts are springing up across the nation among those with a strong anti-government bent and a legal ax to grind.

In the Norton case, authorities believe the "ruling" was sought by Russell Landers and Dana Dudley, the two Colorado fugitives who holed up at the Freemen compound during the FBI siege in Jordan, Mont.

"They live in a mythical world of common law, which only they can interpret," said Garfield, Mont., County Attorney Nickolas Murnion at a November congressional hearing. "As ludicrous as it sounds, they believe it completely and are apparently willing to defend it with guns and their lives." Their refusal to recognize federal and state law has its roots in the New Deal, when Congress approved the War and Emergency Powers Act of 1933 to help President Franklin D. Roosevelt grapple with the Great Depression. Because the Congress never rescinded the emergency powers, common-law advocates say the current government and its laws - including those mandating federal income tax, driver's licenses and vehicle registration - are illegal.

Gene Schroeder, a Colorado Springs veterinarian active in the common-law movement, said the courts are a legitimate response to an illegitimate government.

"Once the feds begin to do things outside the authority delegated to them by the Constitution, under the First Amendment the people do have a right to assemble and petition for redress," Dr. Schroeder said.

In an April report titled "False Patriots," the Southern Poverty Law Center estimates that common-law courts are now being conducted in at least 40 states. They appoint judges, select juries, hear evidence and render verdicts, all issued on documents that look official except for the odd court names and strange declarations.

Even experienced clerks and law enforcement officials have been fooled. Arapahoe County (Colo.) Sheriff's Department Lt. Keith Schooler recalls serving papers in February issued by a common-law court on a local church before realizing they were bogus.

"We got a call back saying, `What's the meaning of this?' which was the first clue I had that anything was going on," said Lt. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

`Courts of Common Law' Punish with Phony Paper: `Patriot' Movement Has Fooled Many
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.