Canadian Civil Liberties, Holocaust Denial, and the Zundel Trials

By Hasian, Marouf A., Jr. | Communications and the Law, September 1999 | Go to article overview

Canadian Civil Liberties, Holocaust Denial, and the Zundel Trials


Hasian, Marouf A., Jr., Communications and the Law


"Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms.., freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication....(1)"

"I hope not everybody in Canada is as ready to abandon freedom of speech as this jury is."(2)

The advent of the Internet and the opening up of the information superhighway has been a mixed blessing for many of the world's democratic governments. On the one hand, tens of millions of people now have access to new sites of information. Yet on the other hand the novel technologies also have opened up the possibilities of increasing the amount of misinformation that is produced and circulated around the world. Some of the most die-hard protectors of an open "marketplace of ideas" worry about the potential abuses of the Internet.

Perhaps one of the thorniest problems in the realm of freedom of expression involves the question of what to do about Holocaust deniers. We are living during a period where we are simultaneously witnessing the loss of our last Holocaust survivors and an exponential growth in Holocaust-denial literature.(3) Our dominant cultural and legal defenses of liberalism and tolerance are being challenged daily by critics from both the right and left ends of our political spectrum. One fruitful way of learning about the range of options available to combat this problem comes from observing how nations besides the United States have dealt with Holocaust deniers.(4)

The purpose of this article is to provide a basic overview of some of the trials and tribulations that have come from Canada's legal experiences with Holocaust issues. More specifically, it illuminates the ways that the Ernst Zundel trials provide a context for discussing the principles and interests involved in coping with Holocaust deniers. Unlike most American jurisprudential norms that highlight the libertarian, almost absolute nature of free expression, Canadian laws are built around a much more communitarian approach to free speech and free press rights. "The proliferation of hate speech in cyberspace," notes Gosnell, "poses difficult questions for the application of the principle of freedom of expression in Canada."(5)

To explain the importance of the Zundel trials, this article is divided into five major sections. First it provides background regarding some of the international issues related to the Holocaust and Internet regulation. Second, it briefly summarizes the chronological events involved in the Zundel trials. The third and the fourth sections discuss the pros and cons of using balancing tests and the imposition of strict regulations on Internet sites. Finally, the article discusses the free expression implications of following Canada's lead in dealing with Holocaust deniers.

I. THE EXTENT AND LIMITS OF FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IN INTERNATIONAL HOLOCAUST-DENIAL CASES

Following Reno v. ACLU,(6) it appears that United States decisions will continue to hold that most regulations of the Internet based on content are unconstitutional. As Fogo-Schensul wistfully complained in early 1998, "[T]he First Amendment precludes the possibility that the United States could officially regulate the dissemination of Holocaust denial materials over the 'Net with respect to domestic regulation."(7) Granted, we have had occasional instances where the United States has found exceptions to First Amendment protections--libel; time, place, and manner restrictions; clear and present dangers; fighting words; etc. Yet these are considered to be rare instances of restrictions on our "marketplace of ideas." When it comes to the issue of Holocaust denial, web site creators take this theorizing seriously, often acting out these libertarian freedoms by creating new linkages and mirror sites when other nations have banned or strictly regulated Holocaust-denial material.

This has created many legal conundrums for other countries that have tried to stop the creation and spread of Holocaust-denial material in their own backyards. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Canadian Civil Liberties, Holocaust Denial, and the Zundel Trials
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.