Appeals Court Backs 12-Lane Wilson Bridge: Work Could Commence Next Fall

By Koren, Leslie | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), December 18, 1999 | Go to article overview

Appeals Court Backs 12-Lane Wilson Bridge: Work Could Commence Next Fall


Koren, Leslie, The Washington Times (Washington, DC)


Construction can begin as soon as October on a new 12-lane Woodrow Wilson Bridge, a federal court of appeals panel ruled yesterday.

The unanimous decision by the three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia is a major victory for proponents of the bridge replacement. The replacement bridge has been bogged down since April by District Judge Stanley Sporkin's ruling that more environmental studies were needed on a narrower, 10-lane alternative before construction could begin.

"This is a win for the commuters of the Washington Metropolitan area," U.S. Transportation Secretary Rodney E. Slater said at a news conference.

Yesterday's decision eliminates one of the two remaining hurdles toward beginning work on the new bridge. Actual digging cannot start until the government finds an additional $600 million to complete the funding package for the $1.9 billion project.

Top transportation officials, as well as business groups and the area's congressional delegation, hailed yesterday's decision.

"It was a dramatic rejection of the idea that a group of people can take environmental laws and essentially hold the entire region hostage," said Barry M. Hartman, an attorney from Kirkpatrick and Lockhart, which filed a friend-of-the-court brief on behalf of the Greater Washington Board of Trade.

The co-leader for the Coalition for a Sensible Bridge, one of the plaintiffs in the case, said the group is very disappointed in the decision but it will continue to fight for a 10-lane bridge. It will decide next year whether to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court or ask the same appeals court to reconsider.

"We lost a battle. I don't think we've lost the war. We haven't ruled out anything right now," said Judy McVay, co-chairman of the coalition.

The appeals court judges reversed all three aspects of the lower court's ruling, finding that the Federal Highway Administration did not violate:

* The National Environmental Protection Act by ruling out a 10-lane bridge as a reasonable alternative and thereby not conducting the most extensive environmental studies;

* The National Historic Preservation Act by deferring evaluation of unknown historic sites within the construction area before design work was begun;

* The Department of Transportation Act when deciding on a larger bridge that will require use of protected land such as parklands and wetlands, because a smaller bridge would not satisfy the transportation needs of the project - established by the Highway Administration.

Yesterday's ruling acknowledged the political wrangling over the bridge by stating the courts cannot rule on politics or preferences but only on process.

"Our obligation is not to further our beau ideal of a bridge design, but merely to ensure that the procedures mandated by these statutes have been complied with. We hold that the Administration has satisfied the requirements . . ." read the decision written by Circuit Judge Laurence Silberman, on behalf of Circuit Judges A. Raymond Randolph and Stephen F. Williams.

As for the environmental law decision, Judge Silberman wrote that the courts must determine whether the administration was reasonable when it stated the objectives of the project. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Appeals Court Backs 12-Lane Wilson Bridge: Work Could Commence Next Fall
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.