The President and the Vital Center

By Kilgore, Ed | The World and I, March 1997 | Go to article overview

The President and the Vital Center


Kilgore, Ed, The World and I


The president needs to advance an agenda for nonbureaucratic, activist government that can muster bipartisan support.

On the eve of the 1996 election, Washington opinion leaders shared a powerful consensus that Bill Clinton was about to win a second term with no real mandate for a particular course of action. He lacked, in their view, an internal compass to guide him in the absence of a future campaign.

Many Republicans appeared to believe their own campaign rhetoric about the outcome of congressional races determining "which Bill Clinton" would govern from the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue. Many traditional liberals nourished hope that a Democratic president, once freed from the constraints of electoral politics, would "rediscover his principles" and devote his second term to the vindication and expansion of New Deal and Great Society programs.

Continued Republican control of Congress and the personnel changes the president made after the elections effectively laid to rest both the hopes and fears that 1997 would feature a return to loud-and-proud liberalism in Washington. But conventional observers have continued to assert that the centrist message the president campaigned on--and has emphatically announced as the touchstone of his second administration--is a matter of crude positioning rather than firm principle.

Furthermore, many assume that the president's success in governing from the "vital center" depends entirely on the willingness of congressional Republicans and Democrats to forge policies that represent a split-the-difference compromise between their traditional liberal and conservative positions. In effect, many of the voices now calling for bipartisanship in Washington are implicitly asking policymakers in both parties to adopt the same unprincipled, crude positioning that they believe the president has successfully pursued.

These assumptions arguably (and crucially) misjudge public opinion, the nature of the "vital center" in American politics, Clinton's record and current intentions, and the value of bipartisanship.

A mandate for an activist government

The 1996 vote expressed a sense of revulsion against traditional Left-Right partisanship in Washington. Voters demanded that both parties cooperate to make the federal government an instrument for addressing the nation's problems and helping them solve their own.

But they did not demand bipartisanship for the sake of bipartisanship--or some imaginary midpoint between traditional liberal and conservative positions.

In 1996, as in '92 and '94, voters sent the message that they want an entirely different style of governing in Washington: nonbureaucratic, activist government.

In electing Clinton in 1992, in chastising congressional Democrats in 1994, and in reelecting Clinton by a larger margin in 1996, swing voters have not been lurching from left to right to left again. As presidential pollster Mark Penn demonstrated in his postelection survey for the Democratic Leadership Council, the voters deciding the presidential election strongly rejected "big government" solutions to national problems. Just as strongly, the voters endorsed "smart government" activism, in which public resources are used in imaginative ways to equip Americans with the tools they need to deal with the problems of daily life.

That is why they responded positively to presidential proposals--almost universally derided in Washington as small-bore, symbolic measures--such as the V-chip, family medical leave, teen curfews, school uniforms, and tax credits for higher education and home purchases. And according to Penn, that is why they failed to give Democrats control of Congress, even as they expressed but limited enthusiasm for the Republican majority: Unlike Clinton, congressional Democrats were perceived as mired in an old-fashioned, tax-and-spend, big government mind-set.

Most traditional liberals and conservatives have a hard time discerning, much less embracing, the public's craving for nonbureaucratic, activist government. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The President and the Vital Center
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.