Coordinating a Distributed Planning System

By desJardins, Marie; Wolverton, Michael | AI Magazine, Winter 1999 | Go to article overview

Coordinating a Distributed Planning System


desJardins, Marie, Wolverton, Michael, AI Magazine


This article describes distributed SIPE-2 (system for interactive planning and execution) (DSIPE), a distributed version of the SIPE-2 hierarchical task network (HTN) planning system (Wilkins 1988). DSIPE provides the user with semiautomated generation of crisis-response options, in the presence of multiple, competing objectives and constraints, within a distributed computing environment that includes multiple planners collaboratively creating a plan to achieve a set of common objectives. DSIPE is most closely related to Corkill's (1979) distributed version of NOAH, a nonlinear hierarchical planner from which SIPE-2 is conceptually descended. DSIPE extends the ideas in distributed NOAH by focusing on efficient communication among planners and the creation of a common partial view of subplans. All the capabilities described in this article are part of the current implemented system, except where noted. Our current application domain is maritime campaign planning, but the techniques are domain independent.

Distributed Planning

In our distributed planning environment, multiple copies of the DSIPE planner run on separate processors that are connected across a network. These distributed processes communicate with each other by message passing.(1) Each instance of DSIPE supports a human planner. We refer to the human planner as the user, DSIPE as the planning system, and the user and planning system together as a planning cell.

As in SIPE-2, plans in DSIPE are represented as partially ordered networks of tasks and subgoals. Plans are expanded by applying planning operators, which represent templates or strategies for solving a goal. Each operator has preconditions (gating applicability conditions), constraints (used for binding variables and assigning resources), a plot (a partially ordered network of tasks and subgoals that expands the goal being solved), and effects (postconditions that are expected to be true in the world state after the plot is applied).

A high-level view of our distributed planning architecture is shown in figure 1. Goals are distributed from a coordinating planning cell down to lower-level planning cells, which exchange information with each other as they expand their subplans. (Although only two lower-level planning cells are shown, the architecture can support an arbitrary number of cells. Also, a lower-level planning cell can itself act in the role of a coordinator for additional planning cells, resulting in a hierarchy of cells.) Each planning cell has a partial view of the other cells' subplans, with explicit dependencies and relationships with the local cell's subplan.

[Figure 1 ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

Throughout the article, we demonstrate DSIPE'S operation using an example from the maritime planning domain. The scenario is a noncombatant evacuation operation in which civilian personnel must be evacuated from a city where there has been an insurrection. A Marine Corps planner and a naval planner must work together to clear and land on a beach, move inland, and evacuate the civilians to an offshore vessel. The planners in this example have separate but related requirements, goals, and priorities. Although their requirements overlap for this mission, they each have independent goals (other missions to be performed or supported), capabilities, and resources.

Distributing Goals

Distributed planning in DSIPE follows the hierarchical model used by SIPE-2. The coordinating planning cell develops a high-level plan that achieves the top-level objectives of the current planning problem. The coordinator then distributes this high-level plan to lower-level planning cells, partitioning the subgoals among the cells. This model works well in the military environment because the planning cell levels naturally correspond to echelons in the military hierarchy. In a less structured collaborative environment, alternative models of goal distribution might be required; for example, each cell might develop its own goal set and notify the other agents what it was planning to work on. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Coordinating a Distributed Planning System
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.