GM Foods in Perspective: Part Two

By Pires-O'Brien, Joaquina | Contemporary Review, February 2000 | Go to article overview

GM Foods in Perspective: Part Two


Pires-O'Brien, Joaquina, Contemporary Review


THE UK Commotion on GM Foods

THE European Union accepted the growing of genetically modified (GM) crops, and 2,000 hectares of GM maize were planted in France in 1988. Yet, during 1999 the world watched with perplexity the furore that swept the British media regarding the issue of GM foods from where it outstretched to Europe and to the other continents. In the UK the commotion seemed to have been triggered by the arrival of imported GM food products and the start of the first GM crop field-trials.

In the UK, between May and August of last year there were seven incidents in which activists seized and destroyed GM crop trials. On 11 July, even a stand of poplars adapted for paper production with the addition of a gene that prevents the hardening of lignin, was vandalised. In the case of the poplars, it became very difficult for the perpetrators to find a justification since the modified trees would require less energy and fewer chemicals during pulping, making the process kinder to the environment, wrote Andy Coghkan in the July 24th edition of The New Scientist. That did not cut any ice with the many newspapers, eager to profit from the publicity caused by the genetic modified organism (GMO) polemic. Facts became confused with fiction and reason with opinion.

Besides the lawbreaking activists, fierce critics came from consumer groups. On June 13, Paul Nuki, Consumer Affairs Editor of The Sunday Times, criticised the lack of a representative of the Consumer's Association in the government committees set up to control the commercial licensing of GM crops in the UK. He also accused the majority of committee members to have connections with biotechnology companies.

Further, on the 28 July, in The Times, Simon Jenkins wrote what I consider the most poignant article in the British press about GM crops, entitled 'The Seeds of Insanity'. Jenkins started by condemning the vandalism of the maize crop-size trial in Norfolk, by Lord Meltchett, the 51-year-old director of Greenpeace and 27 Greenpeace activists. According to him, 'Like many conservation bodies, it (Greenpeace), speaks for nobody but its staff and their financial backers. Money is raised chiefly by publicising highly exploitable incidents, often of lawbreaking.' After criticising strongly the profession of environmental conservation: 'Conservation is a profession whose students need never sit degrees', he proceeded with a list of the benefits from GM technology to economise agrochemicals and lead to a more sustainable agriculture. His other comments, regarding the absence of scientists in the debate, are mentioned further on in this paper. On August 2, also in The Times, Lord Rees-Mogg made a shrewd comment on th e same incident: 'Standing on the moral ground does not put one above the law', he argued.

In an article published by The Times (August 23) Doug Parr, Campaign Director of Greenpeace, complained about the scientific criteria adopted by the government regulation of GM Technology and shared his wisdom that GM food is a matter of risk politics and as such, the matter should be decided by the majority of the people. His other argument is an assumption that there is no market in Britain for these crops, even if permits were granted for their sale.

The Royal Society, one of the world's most prestigious scientific bodies, in September 1998 released a report analysing the subject of genetically modified species including crops. The report supported the legitimate aspects of biotechnology of GMOs and concluded that scientific trials should be carried out and that these should include monitoring of the effects of GM crops to wildlife. During the meeting of The British Society for the Advancement of Science, in August, its president drew attention to the fact that the delay caused by the trial destruction would make UK biotechnology lag behind other countries.

The Misconceptions

To get a clear vision of GM crops in Britain we must remove any prejudice gained as a result of our natural desire to belong and to be accepted. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

GM Foods in Perspective: Part Two
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.