Ideology, Theory, and Revolution: Lessons from the Mau Mau of Kenya

By Mazrui, Al-Amin | Monthly Review, September 1987 | Go to article overview

Ideology, Theory, and Revolution: Lessons from the Mau Mau of Kenya


Mazrui, Al-Amin, Monthly Review


IDEOLOGY, THEORY, AND REVOLUTION: LESSONS FROM THE MAU MAU OF KENYA

Patrick Adams has depicted peasant reaction against colonialism in Africa (including the militant Mau Mau reaction) as somewhat spontaneous, conceptually parochial, and lacking ideological foundation.1 This view is, in fact, not uncommon and can be found in a number of historical accounts of the Mau Mau movement in colonial Kenya. But how valid is this conception of the anticolonial efforts of the peasantry in Africa? To what extent can we regard the specific instance of the militant Mau Mau insurrection against British colonial rule in Kenya as nonideological in its direction? This question obviously demands at least a brief and broad consideration of the history of the Mau Mau movement, to which we will turn first.

The massive land estates expropriated by the British community at the inception of colonial occupation of Kenya, which required an abundant supply of cheap labor, not only displaced thousands of (predominantly Kikuyu) Kenyans and rendered the African land reserves intensely overcrowded, but also transformed thousands of others into landless rural proletarian squatters within the British-occupied farms, generally the most productive agricultural territory. And during the state of emergency (declared in October, 1952) the squatters were forcibly evacuated en masse from the squatments to join the already congested, uprooted, and unemployed population. To aggravate this already volcanic situation, rigid "apartheid' restrictions were imposed on the Africans in the production and sale of certain cash crops as well as in the social and political spheres.

These developments eventually led to a revolutionary upsurge in the 1950s which forced the colonial government to address seriously the agrarian problem. Under pressure from Governor Philip Mitchell, who argued that the seeming political unrest in Kenya had economic roots, the East African Royal Commission of 1953-55 was set up to study the situation and come up with recommendations on agrarian transformation which might help alleviate the agitation among the peasants.

This commission observed that productivity in the reserves and on the land under tribal conditions of tenure was so low as to be unable to supply even a minimum of subsistence for the Africans. Under such conditions it was reckoned that the solution to the agrarian problem was not to allow the Africans to repossess any of the expropriated land, but rather to discover new and more effective methods of land usage that would increase the African farmers' agricultural yield. The formula that the colonial government came up with and imposed on the people to effect such a transformation was the abrogation of all forms of communal land tenure and the substitution of individual ownership. This, it was presumed, would stimulate an element of competitiveness among the African farmers which would (a) increase productivity, (b) lead to the stratification of the agrarian class and the emergence of an agrarian "middle class' which would align itself with the interests of the status quo, while (c) leaving the land estates of the settler farmers completely intact.

This formula explicitly demonstrates the degree to which the colonial government and the British settlers tried to play down the political moving force behind the mounting unrest. They engaged in a kind of economic reductionism that denied the resistance movement its political element. The settlers tended to regard politics (in essence "ideology') as something beyond the simple minds of the peasants, a tendency that would feature once again in postcolonial discussions on the Mau Mau. Contrary to the expectations of the colonial government, however, the objectives of the new formula only led to further agitation. As the Mau Mau themselves proclaimed:

We are fighting for all land stolen from us by the Crown through its Orders in Council of 1915, according to which Africans have been evicted from the Kenya Highlands. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Ideology, Theory, and Revolution: Lessons from the Mau Mau of Kenya
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.