Jurisdiction Stripping Circa 2020: What the Dialogue (Still) Has to Teach Us

By Monaghan, Henry P. | Duke Law Journal, October 2019 | Go to article overview

Jurisdiction Stripping Circa 2020: What the Dialogue (Still) Has to Teach Us


Monaghan, Henry P., Duke Law Journal


ABSTRACT

Since its publication in 1953, Henry Hart's famous article, The Power of Congress to Limit the Jurisdiction of Federal Courts: An Exercise in Dialectic, subsequently referred to as simply "The Dialogue," has served as the leading scholarly treatment of congressional control over the federal courts. Now in its seventh decade, much has changed since Hart first wrote. This Article examines what lessons The Dialogue still holds for its readers circa 2020.

Introduction
          A. 1953 and Beyond
          B. The Dialogue: A Preliminary Look
I.     The Essential Role of the Supreme Court
          A. Hart and the Court's Essential Role.
          B. The Critical Responses and the Apparently Dominant
             View
          C. Textual and Other Ambiguities
          D. The Supreme Court, Limited Government, and the Rule of
             Law
          E. Purpose and Jurisdiction-Stripping
          F. The Hatter
II.     Article III and Enforcement Courts
          A. The Possibility of Judicial Control
          B. Article III Courts and "Public Rights"
          C. Public Rights and Judicial Review
          D. Limitations on Enforcement Courts: Their Validity
             1. Civil proceedings
             2. Criminal proceedings
          E. The Enforcement Court's Law Declaration Duty
III.   Judicial Control of Administrative Deprivations of Liberty or
       Property
          A. Necessity and the Administrative State
          B. Administrative Deprivations of Liberty and Property
          C. Remedies
Concluding Reflections

INTRODUCTION

It seems that we--we've been replicating what, among lawyers anyway, is a famous dialogue between Professors Wechsler and Hart about whether Congress can achieve unconstitutional objectives by preventing federal courts from adjudicating claims that those provisions are unconstitutional. (1)

--Chief Justice John Roberts

A. 1953 and Beyond

1953 was a remarkable year for federal courts scholarship. Hart and Wechsler's The Federal Courts and the Federal System--"probably the most important and influential casebook ever written"--was published. (2) That work still shapes the field of federal courts scholarship. (3) Earlier in the year, Henry Hart published his famous article The Power of Congress to Limit the Jurisdiction of Federal Courts: An Exercise in Dialectic (universally referred to as "The Dialogue") in the Harvard Law Review, which had appeared earlier as part of the casebook. (4) My project is to examine just what The Dialogue's central legal ideas have to teach us after more than six-and-one half decades. (5)

Hart (like Wechsler) had god-like status in the middle of the last century. As a student of Felix Frankfurter, a law clerk to Justice Brandeis, and an anti-positivist (in the late 1950s debate between Lon Fuller and H.L.A. Hart), he was--and still is--the acknowledged standard bearer for the Legal Process School of statutory interpretation. (6) For decades of law school students, Chapter Four of the HART AND WECHSLER casebook, which addresses the general topic of congressional control over Article III court subject-matter jurisdiction, has been the casebook's sanctum sanctorum. The Dialogue long stood at its very center. It was reprinted in the book's second (1973) and third (1988) editions, with citations added and some footnotes annotated, modified, or eliminated. Subsequent editions have drawn upon The Dialogue extensively.

Congress, Hart believed, had wide latitude in prescribing the subject-matter jurisdiction of the Article III courts. But it was not unlimited. Hart's specific concern was with congressional misuse of its authority to "regulate rights--rights to judicial process, whatever those are, and substantive rights generally." (7) It was, Hart insisted, "monstrous illogic .... [t]o build up a mere power to regulate jurisdiction into a power to affect rights having nothing to do with jurisdiction. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Jurisdiction Stripping Circa 2020: What the Dialogue (Still) Has to Teach Us
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.