Are Blood Transfusions Wrong?

By Daley, Brendan O'Farrell Rosemary | Sunday Mirror (London, England), September 13, 1998 | Go to article overview

Are Blood Transfusions Wrong?

Daley, Brendan O'Farrell Rosemary, Sunday Mirror (London, England)

Blood has been the source of religious taboos and worship ever since man first cut himself.

In recent years the Dracula myths and leeching of patients have added to the fears surrounding practices involving the life-giving substance.

Now medical science has the ability to use blood transfusions to cure or alleviate many life-threatening conditions - but some members of society prefer to avoid such treatment. We examine the arguments.

I say Yes

Brendan O'Farrell

Brendan O'Farrell has been a Jehovah's Witness for 25 years. He has been a church elder in Dublin for the past 12 years and helped set up a hospital liaison committee to ensure members receive medical treatment without blood transfusions.

THE use of blood and blood products has become standard medical treatment for many and is advocated as a life-saving practice.

It might seem strange, and perhaps even fanatical to some, that anyone would refuse blood, particularly where life is at risk.

But this is the case with Jehovah's Witnesses.

As with many things in life, there is another side to blood transfusions which most people are unaware of, or perhaps choose to ignore.

At its best, medicine is a risk business and the hazards and complications of blood transfusion are well documentated. Seldom are they explained to the patient.

Apart from the purely therapeutic benefits, there are ethical, legal and religious aspects of this issue which strike at the very heart of human rights and dignity.

When a patient exercises his rights of choice and bodily integrity, in a high risk situation by refusing blood, emotion generally runs very high.

But few ask 'why?' and really listen to the answer.

Jehovah's Witnesses are not fanatical people. They are simply trying to follow the tenets of their belief and conscience. They are not anti- medicine and indeed consult doctors because they wish good health.

They accept all normal medical practice and therapy apart from blood. By refusing blood transfusion they are not trying to commit suicide. They are simply exercising their right of choice, and freedom of worship.

The main reason why Jehovah Witnesses refuse blood tranfusion is religious. The Bible forbids it. When Noah was given God's approval to eat meat, he was told "Every moving animal that is alive may serve as food for you . . Only flesh with its soul - its blood - you must not eat." (Genesis 9:3,4)

This was later integrated into the Law given through Moses. "And you must not eat any blood in any places where you dwell, whether that of fowl or that of beast. Any soul who eats any blood, that soul must be cut off from his people." (Lev. 7:26-27)

"Simply be firmly resolved not to eat the blood, because the blood is the soul and you must not eat the soul with the flesh. . You must not eat it, in order that it may go well with you and your sons after you, because you will do what is right in Jehovah's eyes." (Deut. 12: 23-25)

Finally, when the first century Christian congregation were deciding what carried over from the Mosaic Law into the Christian system they wrote: "For then holy spirit and we ourselves have favoured adding no further burden to you, except these necessary things, to keep abstaining from things sacrificed to idols and from blood and from things strangled and from fornication. If you carefully keep yourselves from these things, you will prosper. Good health to you." (Acts 15: 28,29)

Jehovah's Witnesses believe these words forbid blood tranfusion, just as surely as they forbid idolatry and fornication. We believe words are as valid today as they when they were first written.

They wish to put the doing of God's will first in their lives, even when the 'going gets tough' in sickness.

They keep their eyes on the promise of everlasting life which God holds out to people of integrity. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Are Blood Transfusions Wrong?


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.