Is That Your Final Answer? Draft Candidates Don't Become Millionaries until They Sweat out Psychological Tests

By Oehser, John | The Florida Times Union, April 9, 2000 | Go to article overview

Is That Your Final Answer? Draft Candidates Don't Become Millionaries until They Sweat out Psychological Tests


Oehser, John, The Florida Times Union


Things were going OK, for the most part. Erron Kinney had taken plenty of these psychological tests the NFL gives. Mostly painless, if a bit odd.

Then came THE question, as Kinney remembers:

"Do you like to wear dresses, lingerie?" Kinney, an ex-University of Florida tight end, said laughing. Here in the interview there was a pause, the follow-up question being obvious.

"No," he said, laughing again. "NO!"

Wondering how far the NFL goes these days to test character?

Their attitude toward women's underwear is just one of the questions aspiring draftees describe with rolled eyes and laughter. The April 15-16 NFL Draft is big business, but it's also inexact science with no part more inexact, controversial -- and, yes, more amusing -- than the psychological tests players undergo in the months before the biggest day of many of their lives.

"It's another thing you have to evaluate," Bengals coach Bruce Coslet said. "What we want to know is how fast they can learn, how much they can retain. It's not the overriding factor. It's just another factor, like a 40-yard dash, or can he catch the ball?

"I've seen some of the best-testing guys in the world who couldn't play football. It's a mix."

The NFL doesn't want good-testing guys who can't play, just guys who can. But in recent years, finding the best players has become more complex. Character, once an afterthought, became an issue and there came a need to gauge it. The problem was that, while ability can be seen on any VCR, the head and heart are trickier.

Enter psychological testing, but first, enter the Wonderlic.

The Wonderlic is the most well-known of the pre-draft tests, the score most often cited in stories on off-field issues regarding draftees. But the Wonderlic, widely implemented since the mid-1970s, is more a measure of intelligence and ability to mentally perform a skill.

Character, and how players will handle off-field issues, are different matters. In recent years, teams have increased emphasis on measuring those, too. The result, for draftees, is a winter spending nearly as much time answering questions as running 40-yard dashes.

"Some of the questions are downright ridiculous, but where they ask about background or how you respond when you're angry -- those are a necessary evil," Kinney said. "Even though a lot of guys might not give a full honest answer, you get a picture of a person. They've got to know whether you're going to walk away, or whether you're going to stand there and duke it out."

An average psychological test is no 10-minute, 30-question deal. The test given by the Giants, the most well-known and longest, is imitated by many teams. Infamous among NFL players, it has nearly 500 questions, mostly true/false, many of them memorable.

"They're trying to get at you in weird ways," said Travis Taylor, an ex-Ribault High School and ex-University of Florida receiver. "They're worded in ways I've never heard before. You're thinking, 'What does that have to do with what we're talking about? What does that have to do with football?'

"I guess they want to know what kind of person you are."

Taylor said he understands the reason for the process, even if the process is flawed. Because nearly every team wants to give every targeted player its own psychological test, pre-draft events such as the Scouting Combine and all-star games become tedious times spent behind closed doors, completing long, taxing questionnaires.

The Jaguars, for instance, give two psychological tests targeting character -- one similar to the Giants' test, Senior Vice President Michael Huyghue said -- in addition to the Wonderlic. Multiply those three by nearly 31 in the cases of the most high-profile players, and it's a lot of long days.

"They're not too bad in the morning, but when it's 11:30 or 12 and you're still answering the same questions, that gets a little nerve-racking," Taylor said. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Is That Your Final Answer? Draft Candidates Don't Become Millionaries until They Sweat out Psychological Tests
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.