Military Might

By Paige, Sean | Insight on the News, June 5, 2000 | Go to article overview

Military Might


Paige, Sean, Insight on the News


The U.S. armed services clearly are dominant in the world today, but politically correct policies threaten to undermine their strength in a rapidly changing world.

May 20: the 50th anniversary of the first Armed Forces Day, instituted in 1950 by President Harry Truman as a symbolic way to unify the branches of the U.S. armed services, each of which previously had enjoyed their own day of national recognition. While the distinctive roles and traditions of each branch have endured to this day, the fullest possible integration of their different strengths where it really counts, on the battlefield, remains a Pentagon preoccupation five decades after Truman ordered that the services march shoulder to shoulder on the parade route at least this one day each year.

In the five decades since its inception, Armed Forces Day has taken on many themes, each in keeping with the tenor of the times, including "Arsenal of Freedom and Democracy," "Deter if Possible, Fight if Necessary," "Power for Peace" and "Teamed for Defense." This year's theme -- "Saluting the Best" -- comes at a time when the U.S. services take pride in their status as the preeminent fighting forces in the world. Yet it also comes during a time of uncertainty, when the Pentagon is groping like others for sure footholds in a radically changing world. Though there are reasons to be confident, with Cold War, Gulf War and Kosovo "victories" under their belt, diminishing budgets, humanitarian-mission creep and sagging readiness and morale are casting shadows on this year's festivities.

Also there is grave concern about a "new world disorder" that may result in the continued and growing role for the military in peacekeeping, counterterrorism operations, fighting international crime and responding surgically to the possible use of weapons of mass destruction.

Domestically, the nation's ability to respond to this plethora of emerging threats will be contingent on budget politics and the availability of resources, the strengths or weaknesses of our defense infrastructure and industrial base and on the ever-shifting winds of popular opinion and political demagoguery. Without continued public support, understanding and direct participation, the training, morale and readiness of U.S. armed forces will be undermined, reducing America's ability to influence events abroad and making any but the most instantaneous and bloodless military actions impossible.

And American popular opinion has proved fickle in recent times regarding the propriety of military action, driven by a growing aversion to risking potential consequences, especially casualties. "In developing defense policy for the 21st century, [military] leaders must deal with two related aspects of post-Vietnam and post-Gulf War America," Charles J. Dunlap Jr. wrote last fall in the military magazine Parameters. "The first is the growing aversion in both the electorate and in the uniformed ranks toward incurring virtually any friendly casualties in many military operations. The second requires wars to be won with `a minimum number of casualties inflicted on the enemy.' The rapid end to the Gulf War after pictures of the so-called `Highway of Death' were televised illustrates the new ethical and political perceptions that can influence policymakers."

Military futurists speak in terms of the "digital" battlefield, "dominant battlespace knowledge," "rapid joint-force projection" and the possibility of achieving "rapid dominance" through the use of "shock and awe" tactics. But about all anyone can know for sure is that the future will bring conflict, and conflict may mean war. Because it is highly doubtful that the United States, even with all its gadgetry and technical bravado, ever fully will remove human risk or human involvement from combat, future wars will continue to need soldiers. And they will continue to need courage, discipline and the other martial virtues -- which some believe have been bled from the soft, relativistic, largely undisciplined society from which the pool of future military talent flows. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Military Might
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.