Critical Thinking Disposition and Locus of Control as Predictors of Evaluations of Teaching Strategies

By Ishiyama, John T.; Mcclure, Michelle et al. | College Student Journal, June 1999 | Go to article overview

Critical Thinking Disposition and Locus of Control as Predictors of Evaluations of Teaching Strategies


Ishiyama, John T., Mcclure, Michelle, Hart, Holly, Amico, Julie, College Student Journal


Most studies which investigate the relationship between critical thinking skills and instruction focus on how teaching strategies affect the development of critical thinking. In this paper we investigate how student characteristics affect their evaluation of teaching strategies, specifically critical thinking disposition, locus of control, gender, major and class rank. Using a sample of 66 undergraduates recruited from introductory political science classes at Truman State University, we found that, contrary to the literature, students who exhibited a disposition toward critical thinking rated lecture methods of instruction higher than students with a lesser disposition to think critically; further, political science majors rated lecture methods higher than non majors. However, locus of control, gender and year in school had no relationship with teaching strategy evaluation.

Recently, there has emerged a growing consensus in the literature on teaching strategies in favor of `group based' methods of instruction for undergraduates over the more traditional `lecture' methods. In particular, it has been argued that breaking up the class into small discussion groups better serves to cultivate critical thinking skills among students. On the other hand `traditional' lecture methods of instruction cause students to "fail to learn how to gather, analyze, synthesize or assess information. They (students) do not learn how to analyze the logic of questions and problems they face, and as a result, cannot adjust their thinking to them" (Garside, 1996, p. 212).[1]

This study differs from previous studies on the relationship between teaching strategies and critical thinking skills in two ways. First, although the focus in the literature on critical thinking has primarily been on how different teaching strategies affect the development of critical thinking skills, we investigate how characteristics of students affect their evaluation of different teaching strategies. Second, rather than focus on a single `independent' variable, we investigate the effects of multiple variables on the evaluation of teaching strategies: critical thinking disposition, locus of control, gender, major and year in school. Based upon the literature which suggests that small group methods of instruction are most effective in cultivating critical thinking skills we test the hypotheses that: (1) students with a disposition toward critical thinking will evaluate group-based teaching methods more positively than students who lack such a disposition; (2) students who have an internal locus of control will more positively evaluate group methods of teaching than lecture based methods. Using a variation of the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (Facione, Facione and Sanchez, 1994), a locus of control inventory developed by Nowicki and Duke (1974) and a teaching strategy inventory, the questionnaire was administered to sixty-six undergraduate students recruited from two introductory level political science courses at Truman State University controlling for discipline and instructor.

Literature

The literature abounds with the contention that group based in-class activities are superior as a teaching technique when compared to more traditional lecture methods of instruction (Beyer, 1985). Through such group interactions teachers don't "tell" rather they help students to critically analyze ideas; students are encouraged to become active learners rather than passive recipients of information (Meyers, 1986; Halpern 1987; Garside, 1996).

However, there has been very little work on critical thinking disposition as an independent variable affecting the evaluation of teaching strategies. Perhaps the most complete treatment of the factors which affect the evaluation of teaching strategy is offered by Husbands (1996; 1997). Husbands notes that four sets of factors may affect student evaluation of lecture versus small group oriented methods of instruction: (1) Characteristics of teachers; (2) characteristics of courses; (3) characteristics of students; (4) the interaction between these factors such as interaction effects resulting from gender of teacher and gender of student. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Critical Thinking Disposition and Locus of Control as Predictors of Evaluations of Teaching Strategies
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.