Environmental Reforms in the United States: Policy and Political Implications, and Economic and Scientific Arguments

By Klitgaard, Kent | International Journal of Comparative Sociology, February 2000 | Go to article overview

Environmental Reforms in the United States: Policy and Political Implications, and Economic and Scientific Arguments


Klitgaard, Kent, International Journal of Comparative Sociology


KENT KLITGAARD [*]

ABSTRACT

As we approach the twenty-first century, the measured rise on average global temperature, coupled with the loss of biological diversity indicate that growth of human social and economic activity is reaching the limits imposed by the laws of nature. Scientific understanding calls for precaution and a reduction in growth. However, the political and economic processes of U.S. capitalism are predicated upon continued growth. An understanding of reform needs to be grounded in the contradictions between the laws of motion of the capitalist system and the laws of science, even though such reforms are not high on the current political agenda. The article ends with a series of structural reforms that enunciate and seek to heighten these contradictions.

Introduction: Issues, Objectives, and Main Arguments

THE VOTERS IN the presidential election of 2000, the last of the twentieth century, will choose the first leader of the United States for the twenty-first century. Environmental issues are very likely to be higher on the agenda than at any time since the "Conservation Era" (early 1900s), associated with the Theodore Roosevelt administration. Early rhetorical volleys of today's potential battle were fired when Republican National Committee (RNC) Chair, Jim Nicholson denounced Vice President (and probable Democratic presidential candidate), Al Gore for his role in brokering and signing the Kyoto Protocol (better known as the global warming treaty) in November 1998. Nicholson termed Gore a dangerous environmentalist who was "pandering to far-left extremists in an effort to jumpstart his presidential campaign" (RNC 1998:1-2).

The conservative Business Roundtable called the treaty -- which would require the United States to reduce its emissions of carbon dioxide and five other "greenhouse gasses" to a level that is 7 percent below the 1990 levels in the time period from 2008 to 2010 -- "hasty" and based upon inconclusive science. Their prime ideological concerns range from inadequate provisions for "market-like" methods and potential increases in regulations to furor that developing nations are exempt from the binding nature of the treaty. Practically, conservatives worry about a loss of competitive advantage vis-[acute{a}]-vis the European Union. Equally, vitriolic rhetoric was aimed at the earlier Convention on Biodiversity. This treaty was negotiated at the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, but never signed by the Bush administration. Bill Clinton did sign the treaty in 1993, and in doing so, joined some 150 other nations. However, the ratification languished in the Senate as Jesse Helms assumed the chair of the Committee on Foreign Relations. Business and conservative opposition focused mainly around the provisions for establishing property rights over the raw materials and uses of biotechnology, which is a potentially lucrative market in the upcoming century (Fletcher 1995).

The maligning of Al Gore as a representative of environmental issues is not new. He raised issue of the loss of biodiversity and the potential for human (or anthropogenic) caused climate change, among other environmental problems, in his 1992 book, Earth in the Balance. Gore argued for a set of policy prescriptions that would transcend the confines of free-market ideology and establish a climate of increased intervention in the production process to meet pressing long-term goals. As he stated: "Simply put, the way we think about waste is leading to the production of so much of it that no method for handling it can escape being completely overwhelmed. There is only one way out: we have to change our production processes [emphasis added] and dramatically reduce the amount of waste we create in the first place.. ." (Gore 1992:146). Whether the analysis of (then) Senator Gore can withstand the campaign without substantial compromise remains to be seen. However, the differences in policies are clear. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Environmental Reforms in the United States: Policy and Political Implications, and Economic and Scientific Arguments
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.