No More Board Games!

By Grady, Diane | The McKinsey Quarterly, Summer 1999 | Go to article overview

No More Board Games!

Grady, Diane, The McKinsey Quarterly

To do the job properly, corporate boards will have to become more diverse, more involved, and more financially rewarding to their members

What is wrong with the way corporate boards operate today? In essence, the problem is that they act as though the environment of business were still relatively stable and predictable. Traditional boards therefore remain deferential, reactive, and focused on compliance.

Yet today's successful competitors are constantly evolving--entering new markets, redesigning their systems, and reengineering their organizations. For businesses that seek to stay in the game, corporate transformations never end. Boards must respond by taking more initiative, becoming more collaborative, and adding more value.

Where boards are weak

Problems with boards arise in three areas: processes, or the way boards are run; people, or the personal and professional backgrounds of board members; and culture, or the relationship between boards and management. [1]


Reviewing history--not creating the future--is the focus of traditional board processes. The cycle of monthly meetings gives managers little time to prepare carefully considered strategy papers, since one meeting has barely ended before it is time to get ready for the next. Moreover, structured agendas leave little room to consider medium- or long-term issues; instead, discussion centers on the last period's operating results, problems that have arisen since the previous meeting, time-sensitive decisions, and risk management.

Another problem is that directors often receive management information that is a legacy of the past and sheds little light on today's issues. Boards might ask for additional data but seldom step back to think about which numbers provide real insight, and boards rarely discard a report, even when its information is no longer meaningful. Wedded to processes that look backward, boards have a hard time helping corporations look forward.


Most boards include both executive and nonexecutive directors, but they are almost always cut from the same cloth: men who live in the same city and have similar backgrounds. Boards so constituted lack the diverse perspective needed to challenge the thinking of management.

In Australia, 67 percent of nonexecutive directors live in the cities where their corporations are based, according to surveys by the executive search firms Egon Zehnder and Korn/Ferry. Of the 250 nonexecutive directors on the boards of Australia's top 25 companies, only 9 live outside Australasia (excluding those nonexecutive directors who represent a leading shareholder). Fewer than 10 percent of Australia's nonexecutive directors are women, while about 60 percent are current or former chief executives. Such uniformity tends to undermine the quality and variety of boardroom debate. Opportunities can be missed because directors lack a diverse or global point of view.

Lack of diversity is a problem in other countries, too, but in some of them it is less severe than it is in Australia. In the United States, for instance, few nonexecutive directors are residents of foreign countries, but 80 percent of all boards do include women (compared with fewer than 40 percent in Australia). As of 1997, British companies had even fewer female nonexecutive directors than their Australian counterparts but engaged more nonexecutive directors from overseas.

Moreover, whatever the sex or residence of nonexecutive directors may be, they often lack the time to become well informed about the businesses on whose boards they serve. At Australian companies, nonexecutive directors average 20 to 30 days a year on board work--mostly preparing for and attending monthly board meetings or formal subcommittees. They have little occasion to mix informally with managers of the business or to talk with customers or suppliers.

Compelled to rely on information formally supplied by executives who report to the board, nonexecutive directors have difficulty arriving at a truly independent view of the company. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

No More Board Games!


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.