When Humanists Meet E.T

By Schick, Jr., Theodre | Free Inquiry, Summer 2000 | Go to article overview

When Humanists Meet E.T


Schick, Jr., Theodre, Free Inquiry


SHOULD WE GREET HIM--OR EAT HIM?

For all their differences, Christians and humanists agree on at least one thing: that humans are the most valuable form of life on the planet. Whether divinely crafted or naturally evolved, both groups consider humans to be the crown of earthly creation. Unlike the Christians, however, humanists are not committed to the view that humans, or any particular group of them, are God's chosen people. What's more, since humanists believe that life is a natural rather than a supernatural phenomenon, they have no trouble admitting that self-conscious, intelligent beings may exist elsewhere in the universe.

Such an admission is not so easy for Christians, however. The Bible does not mention the existence of other planets, let alone intelligent creatures that inhabit them. (There are those, however, who believe that the miracles described in the Bible were performed by advanced aliens, not a supernatural god. See, for example, Larry Downing, The Bible and Flying Saucers, New York: Marlowe and Co., 1997.) So, if intelligent aliens were discovered, Christian theologians would have a lot of explaining to do. Not only would they have to explain why the Bible is silent about these creatures, but they would also have to decide whether and how they should be saved. Have the aliens sinned? If so, did Jesus's death atone for their sins? How can Jesus's blood wash away their sins if they have never heard of him? Must they wait until a message or an emissary from us reaches them? Or does God incarnate on every planet containing sinners? However these questions are answered, the discovery of extraterrestrials will require C hristians to rethink their theology.

Contact with extraterrestrials may also prompt humanists to reexamine their philosophy Humanist ethical theories are often based on human wants and needs. Something is good if it promotes human flourishing and bad if it leads to human destruction. But what if something that promotes human flourishing leads to the destruction of other creatures? Is it still a good thing? Does everything have a value only in so far as it can benefit us? Or are some things other than humans intrinsically valuable? Those in the deep ecology movement offer an affirmative answer to the last question. For them, the environment itself is intrinsically valuable. Humans are simply one species among many, and their needs cannot be considered more important than those of any other species. The needs of all species must be balanced against one another for the good of the environment.

Many find deep ecology deeply troubling. Surely, they say, we are more valuable than the other creatures on the planet. But why? What makes us so special? Why do we have a right to life but other creatures don't? Is it that we are more powerful than they are? Does our moral superiority rest on the principle that might makes right? Or can it be given a more plausible justification?

One significant difference between us and other creatures is that we are capable of making moral judgments and acting morally toward others. What makes this possible is that we are both rational and self-conscious. But being rational and self-conscious is not enough to make us morally responsible for our actions. This is the insight behind the McNaughton rule, which says that those who do not know the difference between right and wrong are criminally insane and thus cannot be held responsible for what they do. (It is worth noting that, before they ate the apple, Adam and Eve were criminally insane because they did not acquire a knowledge of good and evil until they ate the apple. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

When Humanists Meet E.T
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.