Henry VIII on Trial: Confronting Malice and Conscience in Shakespeare's All Is True

By Wegemer, Gerard | Renascence: Essays on Values in Literature, Winter 2000 | Go to article overview

Henry VIII on Trial: Confronting Malice and Conscience in Shakespeare's All Is True


Wegemer, Gerard, Renascence: Essays on Values in Literature


RECENT studies have shown that Shakespeare's last play, Henry VIII or All Is True, follows the structure of four sequential trials.(1) Yet, as this article will show, two other trials also take place: the famous trial of King Henry's Lord Chancellor Thomas More, and the trial of Henry VIII himself. As will become evident, malice and conscience are invoked in each trial in such a way as to shed light upon King Henry and upon "All Is True."

The presence of Thomas More in this play poses several arresting questions. First, why does the plot have King Henry accusing Lord Chancellor More of the very charge put forth at More's actual trial? And why, just before this accusation, does the play have Thomas More presiding over Cranmer's trial, a trial that occurred eight years after More's death? Or why does the play present More as leading Anne Boleyn's coronation procession when it was well known that, in refusing to do so, he incurred further royal disfavor? And finally, why have More say the exact opposite of what he publicly attested about the relationship of the king and the English law?(2) Since this play dramatizes the most revolutionary period in Shakespeare's vast sweep of English history and since Sir Thomas More represents what is most controversial during that turning point of England's political and religious relocation, his roles as judge and accused invite careful scrutiny. For the purpose of this paper, however, treatment of this issue is restricted to investigating the structural and thematic patterns related to these trials and to the measures of conscience and malice that each invokes.

Any student of the period knows that Thomas More was Henry's onetime close friend and Lord Chancellor. Eventually, however, after continuous opposition to Henry's manipulation of Parliament, More was imprisoned and executed on grounds of treasonous malice for refusing to recognize Henry's claim to an imperial authority, based on divine right, over both church and state.(3) Yet to the surprise of any reader aware of the political and ecclesiastical revolution of that time, Sir Thomas is never directly associated in All Is True with any of these significant issues. Indirectly, however, as we shall see, the structure of the play presents surprising revelations about the relations of law, conscience, and the monarch(4)--the very issues for which Thomas More died. As will be indicated, the anachronisms and distortions of well-known facts regarding Thomas More provide an important key to unlocking some of the drama's structural and thematic enigmas and to assessing the character of Henry himself.

The first and only time Thomas More is mentioned by name(5) in All Is True occurs when Cromwell reports to Wolsey "that Sir Thomas More is chosen Lord Chancellor in your place" (3.2.393-94).(6) Wolsey immediately gives approval, with these telling lines: "[H]e's a learned man. May he continue / Long in his highness' favor and do justice / For truth's sake and his conscience ..." (3.2.395-97). Here, the fallen and humbled Wolsey expresses his hope that the next chancellor will have the integrity necessary to do justice for the sake of truth and conscience. Wolsey then goes on to give his famous lament for being over-zealously dedicated to someone other than God and to something other than truth and conscience (3.2.454-59).

Truth and conscience as the basis of justice--that is not only Wolsey's final hope but also a major issue raised by the play as a whole, and even by the play's alternate title, "All Is True." The prologue claims that the viewer "may find here truth" (9, emphasis added), but with the qualification that only "an understanding friend" will discover "our chosen truth," while making clear that the playwright(s)(7) have not been guilty of "forfeiting / Our own brains and the opinions that we bring" and that they "intend" only to present what is "true" (17-22). Furthermore, this play mentions conscience and truth--and their opposite, malice--more frequently by far than any other play in Shakespeare's canon. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Henry VIII on Trial: Confronting Malice and Conscience in Shakespeare's All Is True
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.