Reply to Blockley, Donahue & Pollard

By Housley, R. A.; Gamble, C. S. et al. | Antiquity, March 2000 | Go to article overview

Reply to Blockley, Donahue & Pollard

Housley, R. A., Gamble, C. S., Pettitt, P., Antiquity

We welcome Blockley et al.'s paper that raises the issue of calibration in the Late Glacial, although for reasons given below we believe their conclusions are premature. We are also gratified that they selected our paper from among several major books and papers on the period which have appeared since 1996 (Larsson 1996a; Otte 1997; Straus et al. 1996; Street & Terberger 1999; Tolan-Smith 1998). What this wider sample of the relevant Palaeolithic literature demonstrates -- about which Blockley et al. seem unaware -- is the degree of inconsistency in current approaches to calibration. Some of the papers in the edited volumes by Larsson (1996b) and Straus et al. (1996) calibrate, whilst others do not. Otte (1997) presents calibrated dates while Tolan-Smith (1998) prefers uncalibrated radiocarbon years for his study of the British data. This hesitancy is not confined to archaeologists, for the same is seen in geography. For example, at the English Heritage conference on Science in Archaeology, Edwards (1998) does not calibrate his pollen curves, although in a standard textbook such as Lowe & Walker (1997) calibration can be found. This is in a period where good calibration curves are available and the author is a former chair of the NERC Radiocarbon Accelerator Dating Service Advisory Panel. Consequently we agree with Street & Terberger (1999: 260), writing in ANTIQUITY, that in the Late Glacial:

Until there is consensus for a common calibration system, the presentation of the `raw dates' avoids confusion and even the uncalibrated radiocarbon dates provide convincing evidence for continuity or hiatus of settlement in different regions of Europe.

Let us be clear what Blockley et al. are advocating, namely the use of the 1993 and 1998 marine curves for calibrating radiocarbon determinations on terrestrial archaeological samples. It is important to realize just how problematic these curves currently are for uncritical archaeological use. The marine curves are based on paired U/Th and AMS [.sup.14]C determinations of corals. Although it is assumed that U/Th ages conform to a calendrical timescale, it is not proven. One only need look at the early history of the [.sup.14]C method to see how we once thought [.sup.14]C was an absolute method and it was only later realized that uncalibrated [.sup.14]C ages were not calendar years. There is also the question whether corals are closed-systems, for if loss or exchange of Th has occurred the data will be invalid. However, the over-riding problem for this period is the varying marine reservoir effect. Fluctuations in the amount of old carbon incorporated into the oceans during deglaciation means that the 400-year present-day offset cannot be assumed. Although we acknowledge that the marine curves are useful for indicating the long-term age offset between the [.sup.14]C timescale and calendrical time, the smoothed nature of the ocean-derived data and the variable marine reservoir effect means they should only be used with caution. It is because the calibration data are so heavily smoothed that Blockley et al. dispute our notion of a northward movement of peoples. We acknowledge that calibration should be a goal but to have simply adopted the marine data as it was available in 1997 seemed to us premature. The subsequent publication, in late 1998, of a new integrated decadel calibration curve (Stuiver et al. 1998) partly answers these concerns, but the precision is still poor in the Late Glacial once beyond the limit of the German Pine dataset (i.e. for ages [is greater than]11,871 calendar years BP).

In essence, Late Glacial Palaeolithic archaeology is undergoing the interest that surrounded the first calibration curve 25 years ago that gave us Wessex without Mycenae (Renfrew 1968). We need to ensure that, as calibration is extended, it is extended for a good archaeological reason. Clearly the issue of re-colonization and settlement pattern is fertile ground for wanting the precision which calibration offers. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Reply to Blockley, Donahue & Pollard


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.