`The Mystery of Husbandry': Medieval Animals and the Problem of Integrating Historical and Archaeological Evidence

By Albarella, Umberto | Antiquity, December 1999 | Go to article overview

`The Mystery of Husbandry': Medieval Animals and the Problem of Integrating Historical and Archaeological Evidence


Albarella, Umberto, Antiquity


Introduction

In 1697 one Leonard Meagre published a general farming treatise entitled The Mystery of Husbandry: or Arable, Pasture and Woodland improved (Fussell 1947). This title is still relevant today as medieval and early modern husbandry are for us in many respects as mysterious as they were in the 17th century. It also suits the subject of this paper well as there is nothing better to highlight the uncertainty of our knowledge than two sources of evidence which often provide conflicting results.

In this paper I will discuss the problem of comparing and integrating archaeological -- more specifically `zooarchaeological' -- and historical evidence for medieval and early modern husbandry. I will mainly rely on examples drawn from the research I have carried out, with colleagues, in the last six years in England. However, I hope that some of the methodological aspects of this discussion may be relevant to other geographic areas too.

A few case-studies are presented. We will see that in some cases our data stress the existence of biases, gaps and inconsistencies in either of the two disciplines. In others it will be clear that only through the combined effort of historians and archaeologists will it be possible to solve specific problems. It is also stressed that not all is problematic or incongruous and that cases in which historical and archaeological sources fit well together and provide consistent information do exist. Finally, I briefly discuss what lessons we can learn from the problems and where and how possible solutions are likely to be found.

This paper is written from the point of view of the zooarchaeologist; thus I have no claim to tackle these problems in a completely objective way. Criticisms from historians, other archaeologists and fellow zooarchaeologists are welcome. My ultimate aim and hope is to stimulate some debate and to encourage an exchange of information and ideas.

Counting sheep

One of the basic tasks of zooarchaeological analysis is to calculate the frequency of different animal species present in an archaeological assemblage. Despite methodological problems in carrying out these quantifications we are able to provide some clues about the relative importance of different animals. Medieval bone assemblages are almost invariably dominated by the bones of cattle, sheep and pig, namely the domestic mammals -- with the horse -- of greatest economic importance. Much more variable -- and difficult to assess -- is the relative importance of each of these three species.

Although much variation occurs between early and late medieval sites, between urban and rural sites and between sites of different social status (Grant 1988; Albarella & Davis 1996), cattle and sheep bones tend to be more common than pig bones. The relative distribution of the two most common species is highly variable, but it is probably not totally incorrect to state that, on average, bones of cattle and sheep tend to be equally numerous. However, sheep are generally more frequent on rural sites and cattle in towns (FIGURE 1) and sheep increased in number in the later Middle Ages -- a change possibly connected to the expansion of land devolved to pasture (Campbell et al. 1996) and to the increasingly flourishing wool market. Regional variation also occurs. Methodological problems can also create much variation in the frequency of the two species; sheep bones are much smaller than cattle bones and on sites where the recovery has been poor sheep tend to be much under-represented. However, despite all these differences it is clear that cases in which either one of these two species is far more common than the other are rare.

[Figure 1 ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

During most of the Middle Ages the main concern in cattle and sheep husbandry was unlikely to have been their meat. However, there is also little doubt that almost all animals at the end of their life were eaten and the implications of the archaeological findings are therefore clear. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

`The Mystery of Husbandry': Medieval Animals and the Problem of Integrating Historical and Archaeological Evidence
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.