Bush, Gore See Different Roles for U.S. in Foreign Policy

The Florida Times Union, October 22, 2000 | Go to article overview

Bush, Gore See Different Roles for U.S. in Foreign Policy


The overriding foreign policy puzzle facing the next president will be virtually the same as the one President Clinton found when he entered the Oval Office on Jan. 20, 1993:

How to wield American power in a world in which America is the only real power.

It is a burden not easily borne, it has no recent precedent, and it is full of apparent contradictions. When your economy is the largest in the world and your military spending equals that of the next six biggest spenders combined, you can pretty much do anything you want.

But with no strong enemies its own size -- as the Soviet Union once was militarily -- the country seems interested in doing little beyond building and maintaining prosperous economic ties abroad.

America "enjoys enormous influence, but has little idea what to do with its power or even how much effort it should expend," wrote Stephen Walt, a professor of international affairs at Harvard, in the March issue of Foreign Affairs.

Judging from speeches and comments during the presidential debates, Vice President Gore and George W. Bush concur on many basic aspects of American diplomacy.

SHARED IDEALS?

They are both internationalists and free traders who believe in overwhelming U.S. military strength and support the country's military alliances. Both are staunch advocates of Israel.

They part most significantly on America's role when its obvious and vital interests are not threatened.

Bush generally has a more traditional view of where and why the United States should become engaged. He would work closely with allies, he thinks the armed forces should be reserved for specific military campaigns, and he is cautious about entering regional conflicts or using the military for humanitarian missions.

Gore would have the United States more aggressively push its values and try to promote democracy.

He seems far more ready to pursue humanitarian missions, such as distributing food or medicine in war zones, or trying to prevent large-scale slaughters.

Bush has spelled out his position in responses to foreign policy questions during the last two debates.

He said he agreed with almost every instance in which U.S. troops have been sent to danger zones during the last two decades. Despite that, he said he believed deployment should be limited to those instances in which the country's "vital interest" is on the line, the mission is clear, and the force is strong enough to accomplish its goal.

Gore has said he believes in a more expansive American role. He, too, said in the second debate that military strength should be used when "our national security interest is involved, if we can really make the difference with military force, if we've tried everything else, if we have allies."

DIFFERENT WORLD VIEWS

Overall, said Ivo Daalder, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution in Washington, the most significant difference is that Gore believes in an "America that is engaged in the world, dealing with the challenges and exploiting the opportunities to strengthen democracy and promote it, and strengthen and promote our values while protecting our interests and challenges to those interests. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Bush, Gore See Different Roles for U.S. in Foreign Policy
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.