Public Participation and Agency Planning

By Lindstrom, Matthew; Nie, Martin A. | The Public Manager, Spring 2000 | Go to article overview

Public Participation and Agency Planning

Lindstrom, Matthew, Nie, Martin A., The Public Manager

The question of how public agencies collect and use public information in developing plans and programs is an old but important one. This article is based on a mail survey of state transportation agencies and supports the following:

* enhancing citizen participation in the agency planning process, if done correctly and honestly, is worthwhile;

* there are a number of case-specific and innovative ways beside that of the traditional public hearing that are effective and useful, and

* increasing public input in the planning process helps agencies increase their chances of program and planning success.

The Importance of Public Participation

The importance of public involvement in the political decision-making process is well known and often cited in administrative literature. There are a number of requirements that bureaucracies must abide by allowing for some degree of citizen involvement and input in agency decision-making such as those in the Federal Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) of 1991. These statutory requirements recognize that public agencies cannot be managed closed and shielded from the public but must rather proactively seek the public's input. While ISTEA calls for creating "new partnerships" in state and metropolitan transportation planning, some research finds that many states and metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) seem to be responding to the new requirements in a "disappointingly perfunctory manner." For example, one study shows that 58 percent of states surveyed were doing the minimum or less in meeting ISTEA public participation requirements. [1]

There are an array of benefits gained from proactively soliciting substantive public participation: positive public relations, more public trust and support, greater ability to deal with various contingencies and angered constituencies, heightened citizen interest, and knowledge of agency activities, protection against costly delays and lawsuits, and increased overall planning success. Despite various agency struggles, some state and local efforts such as Virginia's s Department of Transportation, Seattle's Vision 2020 program, and Pima County's (Arizona) MPO are greatly improving the public participation process and what to do with such information once it is gathered. These and other jurisdictions have used participation techniques such as citizen advisory committees, mailing lists, Internet sites, and citizen surveys to utilize public input successfully.

Varied Strategies for Input

In 1996, a written mail survey was sent to 107 state transportation officials responsible for citizen participation. [2] With 61 responses, the survey had a 57 percent response rate. The survey was used to ascertain the types of methods transportation agencies employ in acquiring citizen input into the planning process and what level of satisfaction they have had with each.

The first survey question asked "what are the methods you most frequently use to obtain customer (driver-voter) input in your planning and investment decisions." Respondents were instructed to check up to four out of 15 possible methods and Table 1 shows those that were most often cited and the percentage of this total. Due to the statutory requirements of ISTEA, public meetings and hearings are most often cited. Citizen's advisory committees, media strategies, and citizen surveys rank next highest among those surveyed. Those citing other methods use newsletters, a public luncheon, an open house, and a county fair exposition to solicit public involvement.

Table 2 shows how respondents ranked each of the four methods they checked in Table 1 and lists those methods in the order that received the highest level of mean (average) satisfaction (with 1 being the lowest level of satisfaction and 10 being the highest). It is important to note the number of times methods are cited as well as the method's rated success. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Public Participation and Agency Planning


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.