Litigation Publicity: Courtroom Drama or Headline News?

Communications and the Law, September 2000 | Go to article overview

Litigation Publicity: Courtroom Drama or Headline News?

When the parents of one of the students killed in the April 20, 1999 shooting in Littleton, Colorado filed a $250 million lawsuit on May 27, 1999[1] against the parents of the two gunmen, once again courtroom drama shaped media headlines and vice versa. Similarly, the matters involving Aaron Burr, Bruno Hauptmann, Sam Sheppard, and Shirley Egan are other key examples of cases representing reciprocal influences of courtroom drama and headline news.

This article examines the long history of interaction between the public, news media, and the U.S. legal system, highlighting various ways in which their contrasting interests and perspectives have influenced each other and suggesting particular strategies that attorneys might employ to protect and advance their clients' interests through informed and effective use of media coverage.


By way of significant historical background, the links between law, the media, and the public date back as early as the 1800s. The 1807 treason trial of Aaron Burr was the first major case to confront the matter of media influence in a legal proceeding, more recently termed litigation public relations.(2) The case became a public feud between Burr, the past Vice President of the United States, and President Thomas Jefferson.

Contemporary newspapers reported on the arguments asserted by both the plaintiff and the defense in accordance with the First Amendment right of freedom of the press. As a result, Burr's counsel contended that because of the media coverage it would be extremely difficult to locate citizens to serve as jurors who were not familiar with the parties, thus jeopardizing the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial.

The indictment charging Aaron Burr with treason contained two counts: levying war against the United States at the mouth of the Cumberland river in Kentucky, and beginning and providing the means for a military expedition against a nation with which the United States was at peace.(3) To these charges, Burr pleaded not guilty and the jury subsequently found in his favor. The case provides an interesting framework of the interrelationship of the media and the law.

The Burr case provides one of the first documented examples in U.S. history where the court of jurisdiction and the court of public opinion forged a relationship. Michael Sopronyi Jr. of the Harrisburg Patriot recently has observed that the publicity surrounding the Burr case fueled public opinion about Burr's guilt.(4) In fact, research suggests that the newspapers covering the Burr case took sides and included editorial commentary to support their positions before the trial began. Both Federalist newspapers, the Virginia Gazette and The Daily Advertiser, supported the defense and advocated ardently for the accused, while the National Intelligencer in Washington, D.C. supported the state and tried to use its influence to establish Burr's guilt.(5) It seems no coincidence that the publishers of the National Intelligencer were good friends with President Jefferson, who believed Burr was guilty "beyond question."(6)

Burr himself went so far as to blame the media for contributing to his struggle. In replying to the accusation that he had tried to raise an army against the United States, Burr said that the government "proclaimed that there was a civil war. And yet for six months they have been hunting for it, and still can not find one spot where it existed. There was, to be sure, a most terrible war in the newspapers; but nowhere else."(7)

Burr also experienced hostile media coverage in his fatal duel with Alexander Hamilton. The Commercial Advertiser attributed Hamilton's death to Burr's "cold-blooded, deliberate malice." At the same time, no newspaper mentioned that Burr, out of regret for shooting Hamilton, had attempted to go to his fallen antagonist.(8) During the days immediately following Hamilton's death, editorials, articles, and letters compared Hamilton to many other fallen heroes, such as Alexander the Great. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Litigation Publicity: Courtroom Drama or Headline News?


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.