An Empirical Model of Voting Behavior in the Bulgarian Parliamentary Elections of 1994

By Dimitrova, Boryana | American Economist, Fall 2000 | Go to article overview

An Empirical Model of Voting Behavior in the Bulgarian Parliamentary Elections of 1994


Dimitrova, Boryana, American Economist


Boryana Dimitrova [*]

Abstract

There are a number of empirical studies which look at the relationship between economic conditions and voting behavior in industrialized democracies. Free elections, however, are a new phenomenon in Eastern Europe. This study observes the relationship between economic conditions and voting behavior for the Bulgarian Parliamentary elections of 1994. The empirical model uses cross-sectional data from 31 constituency districts in Bulgaria to examine whether votes for parliamentary seats were influenced by ideological factors or economic factors such as inflation and unemployment. The results indicate that economic conditions are important determinants of voting behavior in Bulgaria. In addition, ideology was a major influence on votes in the rural areas. Thus, both the pain of the transition process initiated in 1991 by the Democratic government, and the ideology of the rural population explain the electoral victory of the Bulgarian Socialist Party (formerly the Communist Party) in 1994.

Introduction:

In the late 1980's and early 1990's, citizens of Eastern European countries had a chance to cast their vote freely for the first time in 45 years. These elections attracted the attention and interest of a number of scholars. John T. Ishiyama (1997), for example, studied the differences in the transitional electoral systems in Eastern European countries in 1989-1990. He demonstrated that these differences were a result of the degree to which the opposition and the Communist Party leaders viewed their organizations as seat-maximizing political parties rather than as mass movements, at the time when the transitional electoral law was created. Gabriel Partos (1995) examined the victory of the Communist successor parties in Lithuania in 1992, in Poland in 1993, and in Hungary in 1994. He attributed that victory to the pain associated with the transition from a planned to a market economy. Wade, Groth, and Lavelle (1991) made similar conclusions when looking at the influence of the macroeconomic indicators on the electoral outcome of the 1991 Parliamentary elections in Poland.

In the political-economy literature, the relationship between macroeconomic performance and electoral results, first outlined by Downs (1957), is expressed by the electorate's decision to vote for the incumbent if the economic conditions at the time of the elections are favorable, and to vote against the incumbent if the economic conditions are poor. Some of the empirical research for the United States has been done by Stigler (1973), Bloom and Price (1975), Fair (1978), Frey and Schneider (1978a), and Markus (1992). The existing literature on the subject also includes studies which test the same relationship in a number of industrialized democracies. Among these are the works of Frey and Schneider (1978b) on the United Kingdom, Lewis-Beck (1983) on France, Ursprung (1984) on New Zealand, and Panzer and Paredes (1991) on Chile. With the exception of Wade, Groth and Lavelle' (1991) study on Poland, little work on transition economies has been done. There are a number of reasons for the lack of studies in this area for Eastern Europe. In electoral studies examining the developed democratic societies, voting wends are studied over time within the context of well-established government institutions and electoral rules. In transition economies, including Bulgaria however, the search for the underlying motives explaining the electoral results begins without any pre-existing trends of electoral policies or voting behavior. Incomplete data sets and the fact that elections have been held only recently also explain the lack of empirical studies on the voting behavior in Eastern Europe.

This paper is an attempt to look at the voting behavior of the Bulgarian people for the 1994 Parliamentary elections using cross-sectional data on the 31 constituency districts in that country. In particular, the empirical models try to establish whether votes for Parliamentary seats are influenced by ideology or by economic indicators such as unemployment, inflation, and government spending. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

An Empirical Model of Voting Behavior in the Bulgarian Parliamentary Elections of 1994
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.