Crime, Punishment, and Prevention

By Robinson, Paul H. | The Public Interest, Winter 2001 | Go to article overview

Crime, Punishment, and Prevention

Robinson, Paul H., The Public Interest

OVER the last decade, a remarkable change has occurred in the U.S. criminal justice system. Traditionally devoted to the punishment of past crime, it has begun to focus as well on the prevention of future crime by incarceration and control of dangerous offenders. Habitual offender statutes, like "three strikes" laws, sentence repeat offenders to life imprisonment. Jurisdictional reforms lower the age at which juveniles may be tried as adults, increasing the available terms of imprisonment beyond those of juvenile court. Gang membership and recruitment are criminalized. "Megan's Law" statutes require community notification of a convicted sex offender. "Sexual predator" statutes provide for civil detention of offenders who remain dangerous at the conclusion of their criminal term. Sentencing guidelines increase the sentence of offenders who have a prior criminal history, since these offenders are seen as the most likely to commit future crimes.

The evolution from punishment to prevention has not been accompanied by a corresponding change in how the criminal justice system advertises itself. It still presents itself as a system of criminal "justice" that imposes "punishment." But it is impossible to punish dangerousness within the meaning of those terms. To "punish" is "to cause a person to undergo pain, loss, or suffering for a crime or wrongdoing." Punishment can only exist in relation to a past harm or evil. "Dangerous" means "likely to cause injury, pain, etc."--that is, a threat of future harm. One can "restrain" or "detain" or "incapacitate" a dangerous person; but one cannot logically "punish" dangerousness. Yet our current criminal justice system increasingly blurs the difference between punishment and prevention, as if one could punish dangerousness. Why the shift to preventive detention? And why the attempt to keep the old "criminal justice" as window dressing?

The continuing crime problem

Every society must have a right to defend itself, and our society has good reason to feel it needs protection. Even with the most recent declines, the violent crime rate remains more than three times higher than during the decade following World War II. Today's aggravated assault rate is nearly four times what it was then. News reports commonly celebrate the current drop in crime rates to the levels of the late 1970s, failing to note that by then the long road of unbroken annual crime increases had already tripled the rates of the 1950s. Given the erupting epidemic of juvenile crime, the unknown effect of the coming wave of crack babies, and a host of other predictable or unpredictable changes, the decreases may not continue. But even if they did, the declining crime rate of the last eight years would have to continue unbroken for another three decades before we returned to the crime levels the Baby Boomers enjoyed as children.

And even if crime rates continued to drop every year for the next three decades, people would still have reason to be dissatisfied. As a result of the past three-plus decades of crime increases, people have dramatically changed how they live. We no longer let our children walk home from school alone. We dead-bolt our doors, put "the Club" on our cars, and live in security-staffed apartments and "gated" communities. Current crime rates are as high as they are despite these precautions, and would be even higher without them. A return to the patterns of living we enjoyed when we were children would mean not only reducing crime to 1950s rates but recapturing the freedom and sense of security we had then. The apparent impossibility of that only highlights how much we have lost to crime since the fifties.

From this perspective, it is understandable that Americans should demand greater protection and that legislators should seek new ways to provide it. Yet the trend of the last decade--of shifting the criminal justice system toward the detention of dangerous offenders--is a move in the wrong direction. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Crime, Punishment, and Prevention


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.