The Beards Were Right: Parties in the North, 1840-1860

By Egnal, Marc | Civil War History, March 2001 | Go to article overview

The Beards Were Right: Parties in the North, 1840-1860


Egnal, Marc, Civil War History


Toombs of Georgia: Nine-tenths of the [internal improvements] bills which have been reported, I think are for the [Great] lakes.... Not one of these bills is for the Atlantic coast.... This time the western rivers are left out. I do not think the Ohio gets anything now.

Pugh of Ohio: Not a cent

Toombs: The Ohio river is quiet this time. They either have stopped mending the works or they are not amendable.

--Congressional Globe, May 27, 1858

Slavery was not the only issue that Americans quarreled about in the 1850s, nor were the only significant lines of division those between North and South. As Robert Toombs and George Pugh were aware, areas such as the Great Lakes and Ohio Valley had their own demands. Regional clashes, which mirrored patterns of trade and development, had important ramifications in the political realm. This article, which examines politics and society in the antebellum North, argues that more than any other single concern, the dynamic, evolving economy of the North explains the divisions of the second party system, their disappearance in the 1850s, and the new alignment of the third party system.

In spirit, though not in detail, this work echoes the outlook of Charles and Mary Beard. In The Rise of American Civilization the Beards argued that economic forces shaped U.S. history. The Beards underscored their outlook in the text and in chapter titles such as "The Sweep of Economic Forces" and "The Politics of the Economic Drift."(1) To be sure, their synthesis had weaknesses. In many instances the categorizations ("capitalist," "laborer," "farmer") were crude, and their research on partisan loyalties was primitive. But there is much to be said for the essence of their interpretation. Despite decades of criticism, the Beards remain more right than most of their critics. This article thus engages the long-standing debate over the makeup of the second and third party systems. Historians continue to disagree over whether economic self-interest or other concerns, such as ethnicity and institutional dynamics, underlay party membership and platforms.(2) And because the triumph of the Republican party in 1860 had far-reaching implications for nation building, this analysis also casts light on the beginnings of the modern American state.(3)

Transformations in the economy played a key role in defining partisan divisions in the North. A commercial economy of rivers, roads, ports, manufacturing belts, and backwater farming areas underlay the split between Whigs and Democrats from the 1830s to 1852.(4) Then in the 1850s the rising importance of the Great Lakes economy helped erase the older electoral alignments. The priorities of the lake region shaped Republican policies and party membership. The economy, however, was never the only factor creating political groupings. Religious and ethnic origins, and particularly the spread of Yankee settlement, also played noteworthy roles in party formation.

The division between Whigs and Democrats reflected the commercial economy of the North. Historians analyzing the second party system have frequently noted the links between Whiggery and the "market revolution" as well as the less commercial orientation of the Democrats. In his magisterial study of the Whig party, Michael Holt notes, "The central fault line or cleavage in the electorate separated men with different degrees of experience in and different attitudes toward the market economy and the cultural values it spawned."(5) What has been ignored or little noted in these studies has been the geography of party identity. Yet it is the geographic pattern of political persuasion that provides a fuller understanding of the nature of party lines and their transformation in the 1850s.

Whig and Democratic counties spread across the North in broad bands reflecting the areas of commercial activity.(6) West of the Appalachians the largest concentration of Whig counties lay along the National Road in Ohio and Indiana, and in the Illinois counties just to the west. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Beards Were Right: Parties in the North, 1840-1860
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.