Philosophical Employment: History and Prospects

By Dacey, Austin | Free Inquiry, Spring 2001 | Go to article overview

Philosophical Employment: History and Prospects


Dacey, Austin, Free Inquiry


During the first half of the twentieth century, most philosophers in the English-speaking world maintained a delicate division of labor between themselves and their colleagues in the science departments. Central to the division was a distinction between so-called contingent, or "synthetic" claims, and necessary, or "analytic" claims. Contingent claims were understood as assertions about reality that in principle are subject to revision in the face of new evidence, such as "Tom is a bachelor." Analytic claims were understood as assertions--like "All bachelors are unmarried"--that merely reflect our rules governing the meanings of terms, and therefore say nothing about the extra-linguistic world.

Within the then-dominant school of logical empiricism or logical positivism, synthetic claims were placed under the exclusive purview of the sciences. It was thought that, by limiting philosophy to the analysis and clarification of the logical structure of language, we could purge it of barren metaphysics--such as unverifiable speculation about the nature of causation or the freedom of the will--and thereby boost the discipline's productivity. Philosophy's job was not to tell us what things are like, but to tell us what we mean by things.

By mid-century, however, this job description began to undergo substantial modification. In 1951, W V Quine's "Two Dogmas of Empiricism" shook English-speaking philosophy to its core by discrediting the strict analytic-synthetic distinction, puncturing a barrier between factual and conceptual inquiry. During the next twenty years, as logical empiricism retreated under theoretical attack from various additional directions, some philosophers began to feel more comfortable with thinking and writing in a metaphysical mode. The tradition of American philosophical naturalism was subsequently revived in a number of popular forms, including the idea that an acceptable philosophical theory must in some way be consonant, or even continuous, with the best theories of the natural sciences. Meanwhile some thinkers acknowledged the decline of positivism but in practice continued in a positivist vein to treat philosophy purely as "conceptual analysis." indeed, distinguished philosopher of science Mario Bunge sees the conte mporary scene as one of fragmentation and disarray.

But during the last few decades, as philosophers were busy trying to discern their proper place in a post-positivist, naturalist intellectual economy a development was taking place that would threaten to answer that question for them. With the theoretical and experimental collapse of psychological behaviorism, the examination of processes like perception, memory, and consciousness had again become scientifically respectable. Advances in digital computing and artificial intelligence had given researchers powerful new tools with which to devise and test models of the human mind. Cognitive psychologists, linguists, anthropologists, and philosophers joined in an interdisciplinary effort that became known as cognitive science. Increasingly, neurobiology began to play a leading role in this partnership as researchers turned from an exclusive focus on the mind as a computer program to the exploration of how this program is actually implemented in the brain's "wetware."

Among the discoveries now emerging from the maturing brain sciences are results that challenge philosophical tradition and raise the possibility that certain time-honored problems can be more fruitfully addressed with cognitive scientific methods rather than classical philosophical methods. While philosophy goes on wondering how to put the questions, the cognitive sciences have started to answer them.

Some outstanding examples of such results can be found in the work of cognitive scientists David Noelle and Stephen Stich, linguist George Lakoff, and philosopher Mark Johnson, who have all contributed to this issue of FREE INQUIRY. Dr. Noelle explains recent research that has begun to unravel the neurobiology of "controlled behaviors," such as making choices and executing plans of action. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Philosophical Employment: History and Prospects
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.