Supreme Court Ruling Limits Cost Shifting Attorneys' Fees for Plaintiffs

By Otero, Juan | Nation's Cities Weekly, June 4, 2001 | Go to article overview

Supreme Court Ruling Limits Cost Shifting Attorneys' Fees for Plaintiffs


Otero, Juan, Nation's Cities Weekly


In the Supreme Court decision, Chief Justice Rehnquist wrote, "A defendant's voluntary change in conduct, although perhaps accomplishing what the plaintiff sought to achieve by the lawsuit, lacks the necessary judicial imprimatur on the change." Someone who does not win in court does not prevail, according to the opinion.

Last week, the United States Supreme Court dealt a setback to litigants who have counted on being reimbursed by the other side for their legal fees if their lawsuits, brought under federal law, accomplished their goals.

By a 5-to-4 vote, the court ruled that the fee-shifting provisions of these laws do not apply in the absence of an actual courtroom victory or court-approved settlement agreement. Litigation that only serves as a "catalyst" for a policy change, without producing a legal ruling, does not qualify for reimbursement of fees, the majority said in an opinion by Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist. Some 100 federal laws, including most civil rights and environmental statutes, allow judges to award lawyers' fees to plaintiffs who are the prevailing parties. The theory behind this departure from the traditional rule under which each side pays its own costs is that the plaintiffs are serving a role in the legal system that extends beyond their own interests, acting as "private attorneys general" to vindicate federally guaranteed rights.

For cities and towns, the ruling represents a victory. The catalyst theory relied upon by petitioners in this case and plaintiffs in countless other cases has the potential to be the basis for extortive strike suits that are designed principally to obtain attorney's fees in instances in which municipalities might otherwise have changed their laws without regard to the existence or non-existence of litigation on the issue in question.

Moreover, the catalyst theory is unworkable and potentially greatly disruptive to the operation of local governments. For example, how does a plaintiff prove that his or her lawsuit was the "catalyst" for a change in the law? Will affidavits or statements to the press from a few legislators suffice? Must plaintiffs counsel take the deposition of every member of the city council or state legislature in order to prove that his lawsuit was the "catalyst" for or "cause" of a change in the law?

The ruling came in a case from West Virginia, which had a law requiring that assisted-living or other residential facilities accept only those residents who were capable of "self-preservation," with enough mobility to escape in case of fire. Threatened with dosing by a fire marshal because some residents did not meet the requirement, a group of homes sued the state for violating the Americans with Disabilities Act and a federal fair housing law. More than a year after the plaintiffs filed their suit, the West Virginia State Legislature repealed the self-preservation regulations. West Virginia moved to dismiss the suit as moot; the district court granted the motion.

The plaintiffs then moved to recover their attorney's fees. Plaintiffs claimed that they were entitled to fees because their lawsuit had been the "catalyst" for the repeal of the state's self preservation regulations. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Supreme Court Ruling Limits Cost Shifting Attorneys' Fees for Plaintiffs
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.