Cinema and the American Malaise

By Shafer, Gregory | The Humanist, July 2001 | Go to article overview

Cinema and the American Malaise

Shafer, Gregory, The Humanist

In keeping with the policy of the Humanist to accommodate the diverse cultural, social, political, and philosophical viewpoints of its readers, this occasional feature allows for the expression of alternative, dissenting, or opposing views on issues previously broached within these pages.

Editor's note:

Do violent Hollywood movies create a dangerous social atmosphere? And do they divert the public from meaningful efforts at challenging the injustices of the status quo? Or is movie mayhem really an updated expression of those long-standing cultural values that form a necessary basis for our developed sense of right and wrong? In the following dialogue, cinema is interpreted first through the lens of propaganda analysis and then through that of established mythic and literary archetypes.

THE LIGHTS COME UP, the image fades, and the gaggle of moviegoers begins to adjust its eyes to reality. Two hours of fantasy, replete with special effects and carefully choreographed action heroes, have given them a welcomed respite from the taxes, the humdrum of work, and the din of their rather mechanical existence. Movies are special because the hero and villain are clearly defined and the outcome is rarely in doubt. Movies are unique in their efficacy at pacifying audiences and reinforcing attitudes that promote American values.

Mel Gibson's The Patriot (2000), for example, portrays a hard-working, eighteenth-century colonial who battles the British and vanquishes an enemy that is carefully chosen to suit the provincial tastes of the audience. In working to engender a monolithically pleasing scenario that is so important to most moviegoers, the film ensures that Gibson's character owns no slaves, fathers only adorable children, and is immaculately honest. Because it is easy for people in the United states to distrust and hate the British, producers make them the butt of jokes and the evil oppressors.

Was there actually slavery in this colonial era? What about misogyny? Religious oppression? Of course there was, but movies don't illuminate or deal in honesty. Rather, they dole out pleasing images of the people and ideas with which their audience most closely identifies. In doing so, they massage a tired audience and help it forget the real injustices and inadequacies that surround them.

This desire to mislead and massage is hardly new and has become the foundation upon which cinema in the United States thrives. Images that generate doubt or meaningful introspection are supplanted with films that offer pleasing escape commingled with a reinforcement of established cultural values. While Hollywood hyped The Patriot by promising realistic depictions of U.S. history Oust as it did with the May 2001 release of Pearl Harbor), it delivered a distorted tale that carefully omitted slavery, religious bigotry, and U.S. culpability --anything that could be invidious about the established culture--thus reinforcing the status quo.

And, of course, it was hardly unique in doing so. Indeed, cinema in the United States enjoys a dubious heritage of being an organ of conventional wisdom and simplistic, feel-good entertainment. It perpetuates this pattern and thus has a deleterious effect on a population that is becoming increasingly apathetic and programmed.

Guns, Violence, and Going to the Movies

Perhaps what is most insidious about Hollywood cinema is its efficacy at obfuscating the reality of the nation by reveling in its fabricated glory. In an industry where guns become the virtual appendage of most heroes, it is chilling to note the reality that seems omitted or subordinated. The United States today is in a free fall from the deluge of gun violence, and yet movies continue to mete out depictions that are surreal and illusory. Whether the icon is Mel Gibson, Arnold Schwarzenegger, John Wayne, or Clint Eastwood, the images of violence are almost certain to romanticize the use of high-powered firearms. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Cinema and the American Malaise


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.