Should "Junk" E-Mail Be Legally Protected?

By D'Ambrosio, Joseph | Santa Clara Computer & High Technology Law Journal, May 2001 | Go to article overview

Should "Junk" E-Mail Be Legally Protected?


D'Ambrosio, Joseph, Santa Clara Computer & High Technology Law Journal


I. INTRODUCTION

As both the Internet (1) and the volume of its users continue to grow, (2) it is not surprising that legal problems associated with the Internet also continue to develop in every area of the law. This article explores a narrow issue that has serious First Amendment implications: whether 'junk' e-mail (also called 'bulk' e-mail or 'spam') should be legally protected. First, this article defines junk e-mail and attempts to explain why on-line computer services are trying desperately to curtail it. Second, this article reviews recent cases that have dealt specifically with junk e-mail in the First Amendment context. Third, this article assesses whether junk e-mail may be afforded protection under state common or federal statutory law.

II. WHAT IS JUNK E-MAIL?

As e-mail (3) becomes a popular alternative to traditional letter writing, advertising companies, who ordinarily send bulk mail such as catalogs, brochures, pamphlets and other forms of direct mail, are frequently attempting to tap into this potentially massive audience by sending unsolicited e-mail messages to hundreds of thousands of email users worldwide. From an advertising standpoint, one of the more important benefits of e-mail advertising compared to traditional forms (which advertising companies were quick to recognize) is that it is virtually cost-free to the advertiser. Other than a basic service fee paid to companies who distribute the e-mail ads, there is no per-message charge. Additionally, advertising by e-mail is much faster than traditional direct mail because the messages reach their destinations within minutes. This type of direct on-line advertising is known by various terms, including bulk e-mail, junk e-mail and spam. (4)

Recognizing the potential market for direct e-mail advertising services, many companies now are founded for the sole purpose of distributing the advertisements of various other commercial entities. In fact, companies now sell software designed specifically to facilitate sending junk e-mail. (5) However, due to the vast amount of unsolicited e-mail ads filling up Internet users' mailboxes, most e-mail users have not been thrilled with this new development.

Many Internet e-mail customers now complain to their respective Internet Service Providers (ISPs), such as America Online, CompuServe and Prodigy. As a result, ISPs are forced to respond or risk losing their subscribers. The usual, first response of ISPs is to notify these junk advertisers that they are prohibited from using their respective computer networks to send unsolicited e-mail. Predictably, the advertisers rarely stop sending the e-mail. Because these notices usually do not solve the problem, ISPs create software programs to prevent dissemination of this junk e-mail. (6) Undeterred, the advertising companies seem to find ways to protect their messages from the software by concealing their names and addresses. The inability of ISPs to compromise with junk advertisers has spawned multiple lawsuits, seeking both equitable remedies, to prevent advertisers from sending junk email, and legal relief in the form of monetary damages.

Because of a lack of immediate remedies, Internet users themselves have begun to step up efforts to eliminate spamming because it both interferes with their use of e-mail and violates the rules of 'netiquette' (rules of etiquette in cyberspace). One web site conducting a survey on opinions of junk e-mail reveals what one might expect: the vast majority of people oppose spamming. (7) Not surprisingly, a search of the Internet reveals numerous sites lobbying for a ban on junk e-mail (8) and other sites offering to help users stop unwanted junk e-mail. (9) Despite such sites, however, the problem of junk e-mail has yet to be fully resolved.

III. IS JUNK E-MAIL PROTECTED SPEECH?

The First Amendment to the United States Constitution states "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Should "Junk" E-Mail Be Legally Protected?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.