Subsistence in the Computer Era

By Champlin, Dell P.; Knoedler, Janet T. | Journal of Economic Issues, June 2001 | Go to article overview

Subsistence in the Computer Era


Champlin, Dell P., Knoedler, Janet T., Journal of Economic Issues


The long economic expansion has been widely celebrated as evidence of a New Economy. According to the promoters of the New Economy idea, the technological advances of the computer era are finally coming to fruition. US Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers called the New Economy "Schumpeterian" due to the "avalanche" of creative destruction (Summers 2000). Fed Chair Alan Greenspan noted that the world's output now weighs less because we are moving to an economy based on information (quoted in Rifkin 2000, 31). New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman wrote of remote Chinese villages connecting to the Internet and buying foreign securities (Friedman 2000). These trends are heralded as evidence of a transformation so sweeping and so significant that it has brought about an entirely new economy.

And yet, it is no longer news that the New Economy is full of risks and pitfalls. Even the champions of the New Economy admit that it is a "winner take all" economy. Far too many Americans, as well as millions in the rest of the world, do not share in the current prosperity. While New Economy participants manage their stock portfolios from their home computers, most of the world's inhabitants struggle to secure even a minimal level of material subsistence.

Is there really a New Economy? Aside from all the hyperbole about global markets and hooking up indigenous peoples to the Internet, what is different? While the advocates of the New Economy enthuse about new technologies and newfound financial wealth from the stock market boom, institutionalists and others have noted the loss of job security, the weakening of the safety net, and the widening disparity in wealth and income. Is the New Economy just the same old economy--only harsher and riskier? In this paper, we address the New Economy idea by asking a basic question: What is an economy? Is there a fundamental difference between the old economy and the new economy, or are the differences more apparent than real? We begin by examining the Old Economy through alternative definitions familiar from economic literature. Next, we reflect on the view of an economy implied by the literature on New Economy. Finally, we offer our thoughts on just what is new about the New Economy.

What Was the Old Economy?

The literature on the New Economy ranges from the wary and distrustful to the positively euphoric. One theme emerges, however. The New Economy is successful. It may be risky, challenging, awe-inspiring, or frightening, but most observers agree that it is successful. In what sense is the New Economy a successful economy? Economists point to indicators such as job creation, the accumulation of financial wealth, and the development of new technologies. In this section, we argue that in order to determine whether the New Economy--or any economy--is successful, we must first establish a standard. What is an economy supposed to do? There have been a variety of answers to this question in the history of economic thought, but we can narrow our focus to two basic points of view:

* The now-dominant doctrine that the purpose of an economy is to produce as much material wealth as possible in order to satisfy unlimited wants.

* The belief that the purpose of an economy is the provisioning of all its members.

Most definitions of an economy fall into one or the other of these two categories. Those who adhere to the first definition will regard the New Economy as wonderfully successful, while the advocates of the second view will come to a very different conclusion. Using the second definition, the New Economy is far from an unqualified success. It is also not new.

There is considerable overlap in these two views of an economy. Indeed, Adam Smith saw no difference at all, since the pursuit of one goal simultaneously fulfilled the other. While the rich may claim the lion's share of an economy's material wealth, the poor are capable of providing for their own subsistence. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Subsistence in the Computer Era
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.