The Stock Watering Debate: More Light, Less Heat

By Hake, Eric R. | Journal of Economic Issues, June 2001 | Go to article overview

The Stock Watering Debate: More Light, Less Heat


Hake, Eric R., Journal of Economic Issues


Stock watering, according to its many critics in the early twentieth century, was a way for unscrupulous robber barons to bilk money from the American public. It could also be seen as part of the revolution in accounting practice that made corporate capitalism possible. Thorstein Veblen saw this pretty clearly when, in a New York Times special report, he somewhat facetiously defended watered stock as a new form of capitalization, "something no self-respecting corporation should be without" (Defense 1903, 6).

The new accounting practices that allowed stock watering should also be seen as the legitimation of claims on the flow of national income. As institutionalists appreciate, the claims on income regarded as legitimate develop from social construction. Even if the unrealistic conditions of the neoclassical model of perfect competition were met, claims on national income would not be innate and natural returns to the value of inputs, being instead a part of a complex system of socially legitimated claims. I therefore offer the following story of stock watering and the change in accounting practice for two reasons: (1) it deals with a fierce conflict over corporate practice from our past and has interest for that reason alone and (2) it affords an illustrative account of how legitimation of new claims on income take place. As ongoing processes of claim legitimation are a central part of the evolution of an economic system, illustrations from the past are likely to sharpen our ability to focus on like processes in the present.

According to the US Industrial Commission testimony of John R. Dos Passos, Chicago lawyer and corporate promoter (1900, 1149):

Capitalization is of two kinds; there is a capitalization based upon the actual value of the property and a capitalization based upon earning power.... You will find two classes of people in this country--one in favor of the former method and one in favor of the latter.

As described from the different perspectives of Ripley 1905 (121-122) and Meade 1903 (290-292), the former of these two methods was considered more conservative (or unsophisticated) and found expression in the state charter laws of Massachussetts and Connecticut. The latter was more liberal (modern) and provided the basis for the capitalization of companies chartered in New Jersey, West Virginia, or Delaware. While disagreement remained concerning the techniques and efficacy of the two methods, two facts were generally accepted--two methods of capitalization existed and no national standards for capitalization or accounting existed to delineate the two (US Industrial Commission 1900, Summary of Findings).

The majority of critics of stock watering/over-capitalization, like James B. Dill, Arthur Anderson, and William Z. Ripley, appeared sympathetic to the rise of the corporation but were concerned about the potential for fraud. To understand their concern, and to understand the income claims that the new methods entailed, it is necessary to view the rise of corporate finance in the context of existing accounting practice and the state of the accounting profession at the time.

The Accounting Profession in America

While book-keeping had existed throughout the nineteenth century, it is commonly accepted that the early development of the American public accounting profession was the result of an influx of English and Scottish accountants, serving the interests of British investors in America, with some key firms established in the 1880s and 1890s (Davies 1926, 106; Miranti 1990, 24). The founding of indigenous American accounting firms increased after 1895, as commercial and investment bankers began to require more complete auditing of the new combinations seeking underwriting and other services (Zimmerman 1954, 138).

The rise of professional associations shadowed the expansion of accounting firms with the establishment of the American Association of Public Accountants in 1887. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Stock Watering Debate: More Light, Less Heat
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.