Campaign Contributions by Political Parties: Ideology vs. Winning

By Wilhite, Al; Theilmann, John | Atlantic Economic Journal, June 1989 | Go to article overview

Campaign Contributions by Political Parties: Ideology vs. Winning


Wilhite, Al, Theilmann, John, Atlantic Economic Journal


Campaign Contributions By Political Parties Ideology vs. Winning

An oft quoted definition of a political party is, "a team seeking to control the governing apparatus by gaining office in a duly constituted election" [Downs, 1957, p. 25]. The expansive implications of this definition have proved to be fertile ground for understanding the actions of office seekers. From this perspective, winning is paramount and ideology merely a tool used to obtain this objective. Succinctly stated by Anthony Downs [1957, p. 28], "parties formulate policies in order to win elections rather than win elections in order to formulate policies."

This elegant thesis has resurfaced in spatial theories that encompass participation and voting [Aldrich, 1983(a), 1983(b); Enlow and Hinich, 1984], and it has been broadened by efforts to distinguish between vote maximizing and plurality maximization [Hinich and Ordeshook, 1970]. Still, there is a constant that binds these theories together--the primary goal of parties is to win.

Interestingly, empirical studies find important ideological components in party affiliation. Poole and Daniels [1985] claim 80 percent of the variation in legislative voting is explained by a single liberal-conservative dimension. Similarly, Shaffer [1982] shows a consistent ideological split along party lines. Earlier works [Turner and Schneier, 1970; Clausen, 1973; Clausen and Van Horn, 1977] lend support to the contention that ideology and party affiliation have had a stable relationship over a long period of time.

There is an inconsistency here. If parties adopt a platform with the sole objective of winning, then an historical party alignment would be merely coincidental. The long-term stability found in the empirical studies casts doubt on this explanation. Similarly, if a party exists because of ideology, and if it adheres to this ideology, it will consistently lose to a party adopting a winning strategy. It seems likely there is another dimension involved that may lead to a reconciliation of the theory and empirical findings.

Shepsle [1972] offers a potential explanation by introducing risk. He suggests voters resist the unknown (they are risk averse) and so the adoption of an identifiable platform can be beneficial for a party. This lends an inertia to a party's ideology once it is learned by the electorate.

In another approach, Schlesinger [1975] suggests there are two types of party members, office seekers and benefit seekers. The former wants to gain power and ideology takes a back seat, as suggested by Downs. The second type of individual views the office as a means to an end (the collection of certain benefits). Benefit seekers want parties to adopt an ideology and for allegiances to be known. Schlesinger [1975] suggests both types of individuals exist in all parties, resulting in a combination strategy that stresses winning and ideology.1

This paper expands the above discussion in two directions. First, a reconciliation of the apparent importance of both winning and ideology is offered that does not rely on the specific preferences of voters or candidates (as do Shepsle and Schlesinger): Second, an empirical model derived from this theoretical construct is used to explore party behavior. (1)Some studies assume both ideology and winning are party objectives [Chappell and Keech, 1986; Wittman, 1973] and then explore the implications of these assumptions. For the most part, however, these works do not ask why ideology matters.

I. The Party in a Legislative Body

This paper suggests the importance of ideology is office specific, that is, legislative and executive bodies differ. The theoretical works discussed above seem to be particularly applicable to executive office elections. When a candidate runs for the presidency or a governorship, the state hands over the prize to the winner and he or she gains control of that branch of government. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Campaign Contributions by Political Parties: Ideology vs. Winning
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.