Scottish Banking before 1844: A Model for Laissez-Faire?

By Cowen, Tyler; Kroszner, Randall | Journal of Money, Credit & Banking, May 1989 | Go to article overview

Scottish Banking before 1844: A Model for Laissez-Faire?

Cowen, Tyler, Kroszner, Randall, Journal of Money, Credit & Banking

Scottish Banking before 1845: A Model for Laissez-Faire?

ECONOMISTS HAVE BEGUN TO DEVOTE increasing attention to what the banking and financial system would look like if trends toward laissez-faire, through both deliberate deregulation and financial innovation, continue. One group of authors, who may be labeled the modern free banking school (e.g., White 1984a and b, O'Driscoll 1986, Selgin and White 1987), focus upon the experience of eighteenth and early nineteenth century banking in Scotland as the primary illustration of how an unregulated banking system would operate. For these writers, the Scottish system provides the paradigmatic case of the unhampered evolution ofa financial system. In this view, laissez-faire would create a system of banking based upon short-term nominally fixed debt liabilities redeemable in some form of outside (usually commodity) money. There would be a sharply defined money supply. Banks would not be simply pure intermediaries; they would issue non-interest-bearing notes on a fractional reserve basis and provide other transactional services.

The "free banking" perspective contrasts with the analysis of the "legal restrictions theory of money" and the "new monetary economics," (LRT-NME) (Black 1970, Fama 1980, Hall 1982, Greenfield and Yaeger 1983, Wallace 1983, and Cowen and Kroszner 1987a and b, 1988). In this view, our monetary institutions, e.g., the fixed nominal value, debt-based nature of banking claims, have been shaped by legal restrictions affecting private financial intermediation. Under laissez-faire,the money supply would no longer be well defined, and exchange media could assume such forms as equity shares, similar to today's money market mutual funds, and small-denomination interest-bearing assets. Banks would be little more than pure financial intermediaries offering diverse portfolios against which "depositors" would hold claims, much like transferable mutual fund shares (Fama 1980). These asset-claims need not be convertible into an "outside" money such as gold but instead may pay interest or fluctuate in capital value. In this way, it may be possible that the transactions media would not bear a fixed relationship with the unit of account, in contrast with the current system in which Federal Reserve Notes are denominated in dollars (see Cowen and Kroszner 1987b and 1988).

Without legal restrictions, "it is hard to see why anyone would hold non-interest-bearing currency instead of interest-bearing securities" of similar default risk and negotiability (Wallace 1983, p. 1). The demand for portfolio-dominated assets - today, Federal Reserve Notes - arises because legal barriers restrict the use of other assets for transactions and settlement purposes. If entry into the financial intermediation industry were free, then private firms could "break up" large-denomination Treasury securities into small-denomination bearer bonds to suit transactors' wishes. Competition among intermediaries would ensure that the interest rate paid on the small-denomination bonds equals the rate on large-denomination bonds minus the cost of intermediation. Wallace (1983, p. 4) concludes that under laissez-faire either nominal interest rates would be driven down to the costs of denomination arbitrage, thereby eliminating the wedge between the returns on bonds and non-interest-bearing money, or existing government currency would become worthless since interest-bearing media would portfolio-dominate it.

This approach has been criticized for its apparent conflict with the historical record of monetary and financial institutions. White (1984b, p. 707) questions whether a payments system could evolve in which there is no convertibility to an outside money, and equity instruments are used for transactions purposes by citing "the historical fact ... that deposit banking did not naturally grow up upon an equity basis." In addition, White (1987, pp. 450-51) uses the eighteenth and nineteenth century Scottish banking experience to test the predictions of thelegal restrictions theory, arguing that the coexistence of non-interest-yielding paper currency with interest-yielding bearer assets during this "free banking" era cannot be explained by legal restrictions. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)


1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

Scottish Banking before 1844: A Model for Laissez-Faire?


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.