Scientists Remain Uncertain: `Global Warming' Science: Fact vs. Fiction

By LaRochelle, Mark; Spencer, Peter | Consumers' Research Magazine, July 2001 | Go to article overview

Scientists Remain Uncertain: `Global Warming' Science: Fact vs. Fiction


LaRochelle, Mark, Spencer, Peter, Consumers' Research Magazine


For more than a decade now, consumers have been confronted with frequent warnings that our carbon-dioxide-producing, modern way of life contributes to global warming, and thus is setting up the world for climatic catastrophe--unless we do something to reverse course soon.

Nothing new here, but in recent months the warnings have taken on a heightened sense of urgency following reports that scientific authorities have answered some key questions about the underlying science behind global-warming estimates. This increased certainty, we have been led to believe, strengthens the case for "action" on global warming, which typically involves instituting policies to meet the goals of the Kyoto global warming treaty, signed by the Clinton Administration in 1997.

Whether such efforts would do any good is another issue entirely (see page 43). At this point, judgment about whether even to take action first requires some understanding of the underlying knowledge about climate change. And, as closer scrutiny of the relevant data reveals, the underlying facts on this front are quite the opposite of what has been popularly portrayed.

As trumpeted by the popular media, our new alleged certainty about the effects and causes of global warming stem from two scientific studies: The first, drawn from a lengthy compendium of climate-change data put together by the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), was released this past winter. The second, a follow-up study on the same subject, released last month by the National Research Council (NRC) of the National Academy of Sciences.

In both cases, publicity about these reports suggested, in so many words, that the debate about "global warming" was over. Commenting on the original IPCC study, for instance, Time magazine asserted: "Scientists no longer doubt that global warming is happening, and almost nobody questions the fact that humans are at least partly responsible."

"A decade ago, the idea that the planet was warming up as a result of human activity was largely theoretical," the newsmagazine explained this past April. "... Not anymore. As an authoritative report issued a few weeks ago by the [IPCC] makes plain, the trend toward a warmer world has unquestionably begun."

U.S. News and World Report, among other news outlets, offered a similar take on the IPCC study, calling it "the most definitive--and scary--report yet, declaring that global warming is not only real but man-made."

Yet the study in question was not all that it was made out to be. The publication, a mere 20-page "Summary for Policymakers" based on a yet-to-be-released 3,000-page report, hardly represented an authoritative picture of IPCC science, say climate researchers familiar with the project.

In fact, these researchers say, the full report itself is heavily nuanced, containing numerous qualifications, provisos and cautions about the proper interpretation of the data--as is fairly typical of scientific studies relying on many and varied sources. Most of this nuance was simply omitted in the summary, which came across as categorical and definite, thus giving rise to the scary stories.

It was precisely because of this discrepancy that the second study was commissioned--in effect, a study of a study. Because of serious questions about the reliability of the IPCC summary, in May the White House asked the National Research Council to identify "the areas in the science of climate change where there are the greatest certainties and uncertainties," and to comment in particular on the quality of science represented in the IPCC summary that had been making so many headlines.

And, ironically, the same thing happened all over again. Once more, the report in question stressed nuance and uncertainty. And once more the media stories took their cues from the boiled-down treatment available in report's summary.

Thus, The New York Times reported that NRC analysis "reaffirmed the mainstream scientific view that the earth's atmosphere was getting warmer and that human activity was largely responsible. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Scientists Remain Uncertain: `Global Warming' Science: Fact vs. Fiction
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.