The Polls: Partisanship and Presidential Performance Evaluations

By Bond, Jon R.; Fleisher, Richard | Presidential Studies Quarterly, September 2001 | Go to article overview

The Polls: Partisanship and Presidential Performance Evaluations


Bond, Jon R., Fleisher, Richard, Presidential Studies Quarterly


In the winter of 1998 and early spring of 1999, Democratic and Republican identifiers in the electorate were sharply divided on whether President Clinton should be impeached and removed from office. By more than two to one, Republicans favored removal, while Democrats, by an even larger margin, were sharply opposed (Jacobson 2000). Given the intensely partisan context in which attitudes on this issue were surveyed, such results are not surprising.

Looking beyond the immediate issue of impeachment, we have found evidence of a more general tendency for partisanship to color assessments of the president. There is always a gap in assessments of presidential performance by Democrats and Republicans in the mass public, as those who identify with the president's party tend to rate his job performance more favorably than those who identify with the opposition. But the effect of partisanship has strengthened over time: for most years in the 1980s and 1990s, the partisan gap in evaluations of the president's job performance was appreciably wider than in previous decades (Fleisher and Bond 2001). Although finding partisan differences in how citizens evaluate the president is not new, the growing impact of party on such evaluations has gone largely unnoticed in the literature. Furthermore, much of the literature analyzes aggregate trends. Although studies of aggregate trends are appropriate and useful, they do not reveal the individual-level processes that lead to the aggregate results. In this article, we present additional evidence at the aggregate and individual levels highlighting the growing impact of partisanship on how the public evaluates the president.

Presidential Performance Evaluations in the Aggregate and at the Individual Level

Most analyses of the public's assessment of presidential job performance are based on the over-time study of presidential approval ratings collected monthly, quarterly, or annually. These aggregate time series studies indicate that the condition of the economy systematically affects the president's job approval ratings.(1) While these studies have contributed much to our understanding of the conditions that influence the public's evaluation of the president, they cannot analyze changes in the effect of partisanship over time.(2) Studies analyzing the relationship between national economic conditions and presidential approval at the aggregate level tell us little about how this connection is made or the factors that increase or decrease the effect of the economic news on presidential performance. Brody (1991) noted that aggregate studies assume that individuals (1) receive evidence about the performance of the economy, (2) judge this evidence against some benchmark, and (3) blame or credit the president for the condition of the economy. This model, as Brody observed, is not without problems. Information about the state of the world, including the condition of the economy, must be made available to voters in a way that allows it to be easily received and processed. Few voters are economists with access to economic indicators that they regularly monitor. Instead, the typical citizen is dependent on others to make information available. And even if information is readily available, citizens are not equally receptive to new information. The condition of the economy can only influence the opinions of those who are sufficiently attentive to receive the information. Furthermore, if the effects of partisanship have changed, then the effects of the economy on individuals' assessments of the president may have changed as well.

Information available to citizens consists of more than objective indicators about the state of the world. The news media and political elites filter the flood of information produced and offer guidance about how to interpret it (Ansolabehere, Behr, and Iyengar 1993; Iyengar 1991; Iyengar and Kinder 1987; Mutz 1993). By deciding what gets reported and what is ignored, the media determine what information is on the agenda. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Polls: Partisanship and Presidential Performance Evaluations
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.