THE POLITICS OF LAND ACQUISITION AND STRUGGLES OVER LAND IN THE `COMMUNAL' AREAS OF ZIMBABWE: THE GOKWE REGION IN THE 1980s AND 1990s

By Nyambara, Pius Shungudzapera | Africa, Spring 2001 | Go to article overview

THE POLITICS OF LAND ACQUISITION AND STRUGGLES OVER LAND IN THE `COMMUNAL' AREAS OF ZIMBABWE: THE GOKWE REGION IN THE 1980s AND 1990s


Nyambara, Pius Shungudzapera, Africa


For a long time historical writings on agrarian differentiation in Zimbabwe focused on the racial division of land and on inequalities between white commercial farmers and an increasingly marginalised subsistence sector; the rural population was usually conceptualised as a `peasantry' or `proletariat' (Arrighi, 1970; Palmer, 1977; Moyana, 1984). In posing two mutually exclusive categories, scholars tended to assign each Zimbabwean farmer to one or the other idealised, homogenous category.

Recent writings on Zimbabwe and elsewhere in Southern Africa (see Neocosmos, 1987) have enhanced our understanding of the process of agrarian change and differentiation in the rural areas. They have argued that most rural areas experienced considerable commercialisation of agriculture during and after the colonial period, and that commercialisation gave rise to various forms of socio-economic differentiation among rural households and communities. Scholars in this group have advanced various arguments about how differentiation occurred in rural Zimbabwe. They have pointed to differences in access to land; differences in households' access to off-farm income; the privileged position and political manouevring of chiefs; and differential access to labour, which again is related to various factors, including access to off-farm income, polygamy and co-operative labour (Phimister, 1988; Masst, 1996; Ranger, 1985).

However, even studies that recognise patterns of differential land holding have not shown clearly how such differences occurred over time. Research into land distribution among the Zimbabwean peasantry has largely been limited to surveys documenting the amount of land held by each household at a particular time. There has been little investigation of the process by which land is actually accessed, thus into the means by which some households have acquired significantly larger land holdings. The lack of such a study is attributable to the tendency among scholars to argue that the distribution of land in the `communal' areas is less skewed than other variables and acts as a brake on individual accumulation and on the process of differentiation. Metre Masst's study of peasant differentiation in north-eastern Zimbabwe epitomises this line of argument. She argues that `the differentiation process within the peasantry is ... constrained by the communal land tenure system, which governs land distribution in Zimbabwe's communal lands. This system prevents commoditized exchange of land, and preserves the existing pattern of small landholdings' (1996: 382, emphasis added). She further argues that `land distribution within the communal areas is quite egalitarian', and she attributes this egalitarianism to what she calls `the predominance of a peasant ideology of egalitarianism within the communal areas' (p. 383). Other observers, including the present government, have attributed the egalitarian structure of land holdings to egalitarian values they claim are inherent in the communal land tenure system (Zimbabwe, 1985; Yudelman, 1964).

This article challenges the generalisation of the land tenure system and landholding practices in the communal areas of Zimbabwe. It argues that such generalisation arises from the misconceptualisation of `communal' tenure, a term used in the literature to reflect an African attitude to land rather than a European one. The idea that `customary' land law in general was created under colonial rule has gained wider currency among scholars. Several scholars have demonstrated how the colonial authorities sought to enforce long-established custom rather than current opinion, thereby freezing what had previously been dynamic systems (Colson, 1971; Ranger, 1983; Chanock, 1985). Other writers have extended this argument to the post-colonial period, suggesting that African governments have kept alive the colonial myth of communalism in order to justify increased state control over land. The new governments asserted total control over the lands in the name of protection of African customs. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

THE POLITICS OF LAND ACQUISITION AND STRUGGLES OVER LAND IN THE `COMMUNAL' AREAS OF ZIMBABWE: THE GOKWE REGION IN THE 1980s AND 1990s
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.